PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of combined (double contrast) use of superparamagnetic iron particles (SPIOs) and gadolinium (Gd) in liver MR imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unenhanced, Gd-enhanced, SPIO-enhanced, and both SPIO- and Gd-enhanced images were acquired at 1.5 T. Twenty patients with previously detected liver lesions were included. Fast SE-STIR, and breath-hold true FISP, fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted sequences were obtained with all techniques. Lesion count was assessed by consensus reading. RESULTS: Collective evaluation of all MR sequences revealed 61 lesions in 16 patients; SPIO-enhanced MR detected lesions with a sensitivity of 95% (n=58). The sensitivity of unenhanced MR imaging was 90% (n=55). There was no statistical difference between SPIO-enhanced and unenhanced MR images. From single sequences, the greatest number of lesions was detected with the SPIO-enhanced fast SE-STIR sequence (n=56, sensitivity 92%). By using the fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence, Gd-enhanced and both SPIO- and Gd-enhanced MR images demonstrated sensitivities of 77% (n=47) and 80% (n=49), respectively. Despite the combined use of both contrast media, this sequence was significantly less sensitive in lesion detection when compared to SPIO-enhanced imaging. CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was the most sensitive method in lesion detection. The benefit of the combined use of SPIO and Gd was negligible.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of combined (double contrast) use of superparamagnetic iron particles (SPIOs) and gadolinium (Gd) in liver MR imaging. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Unenhanced, Gd-enhanced, SPIO-enhanced, and both SPIO- and Gd-enhanced images were acquired at 1.5 T. Twenty patients with previously detected liver lesions were included. Fast SE-STIR, and breath-hold true FISP, fat-suppressed T1- and T2-weighted sequences were obtained with all techniques. Lesion count was assessed by consensus reading. RESULTS: Collective evaluation of all MR sequences revealed 61 lesions in 16 patients; SPIO-enhanced MR detected lesions with a sensitivity of 95% (n=58). The sensitivity of unenhanced MR imaging was 90% (n=55). There was no statistical difference between SPIO-enhanced and unenhanced MR images. From single sequences, the greatest number of lesions was detected with the SPIO-enhanced fast SE-STIR sequence (n=56, sensitivity 92%). By using the fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequence, Gd-enhanced and both SPIO- and Gd-enhanced MR images demonstrated sensitivities of 77% (n=47) and 80% (n=49), respectively. Despite the combined use of both contrast media, this sequence was significantly less sensitive in lesion detection when compared to SPIO-enhanced imaging. CONCLUSION: SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was the most sensitive method in lesion detection. The benefit of the combined use of SPIO and Gd was negligible.
Authors: Ben Ariff; Claire R Lloyd; Sameer Khan; Mohamed Shariff; Andrew V Thillainayagam; Devinder S Bansi; Shahid A Khan; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Adrian K P Lim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-03-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Virgil Paunescu; Florina M Bojin; Oana I Gavriliuc; Elena A Taculescu; Robert Ianos; Valentin L Ordodi; Vlad F Iman; Calin A Tatu Journal: J Cell Mol Med Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 5.310