I Okorocha1, G Cumming, I Gould. 1. Grampian University Hospitals, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr Gray's Hospital, Elgin, Morayshire, UK. ike.okorocha@lineone.net
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of unsuspected urinary tract infection (UTI) before cystometry, to evaluate reports of a greater tendency to abnormal cystometry in the presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and to determine the incidence of iatrogenic significant bacteriuria after cystometry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in the gynaecology department of a district general hospital in collaboration with the medical microbiology department of a university teaching hospital. The period of investigation was 1 year and the study population was a sample of women undergoing urodynamic investigations during this period. Data were collected on age, menopausal status, parity, cystometric diagnosis and voiding dysfunction. RESULTS: In all, 117 patients provided a urine sample before cystometry; 12 of these patients had a positive culture, giving an incidence of 10.3% for unsuspected asymptomatic bacteriuria before cystometry. There was a significant association between age and the presence of UTI before cystometry (P = 0.003) and between this UTI and sensory urgency (P = 0.01). There was no similar significant association with detrusor instability or genuine stress incontinence. Nineteen of the 97 patients who had negative bacteriology before cystometry had a positive urine culture afterward. Compared with patients who had a negative sample, there was no significant association with age, parity, menopausal status, abnormal cystometry or voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These results do not support a policy of universal screening for bacteriuria before urodynamic investigation. Asymptomatic bacteriuria did not influence the urodynamic outcome except in patients with sensory urgency. However, we recommend that screening and treatment be considered individually in older women who are being investigated for irritative bladder symptoms. About 20% of the present patients developed UTI after the urodynamic investigation. This information should be included in the counselling before urodynamic investigation and should be incorporated into the patient information leaflet as part of good clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of unsuspected urinary tract infection (UTI) before cystometry, to evaluate reports of a greater tendency to abnormal cystometry in the presence of asymptomatic bacteriuria, and to determine the incidence of iatrogenic significant bacteriuria after cystometry. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study was carried out in the gynaecology department of a district general hospital in collaboration with the medical microbiology department of a university teaching hospital. The period of investigation was 1 year and the study population was a sample of women undergoing urodynamic investigations during this period. Data were collected on age, menopausal status, parity, cystometric diagnosis and voiding dysfunction. RESULTS: In all, 117 patients provided a urine sample before cystometry; 12 of these patients had a positive culture, giving an incidence of 10.3% for unsuspected asymptomatic bacteriuria before cystometry. There was a significant association between age and the presence of UTI before cystometry (P = 0.003) and between this UTI and sensory urgency (P = 0.01). There was no similar significant association with detrusor instability or genuine stress incontinence. Nineteen of the 97 patients who had negative bacteriology before cystometry had a positive urine culture afterward. Compared with patients who had a negative sample, there was no significant association with age, parity, menopausal status, abnormal cystometry or voiding dysfunction. CONCLUSION: These results do not support a policy of universal screening for bacteriuria before urodynamic investigation. Asymptomatic bacteriuria did not influence the urodynamic outcome except in patients with sensory urgency. However, we recommend that screening and treatment be considered individually in older women who are being investigated for irritative bladder symptoms. About 20% of the present patients developed UTI after the urodynamic investigation. This information should be included in the counselling before urodynamic investigation and should be incorporated into the patient information leaflet as part of good clinical practice.
Authors: Bernard T Haylen; Naven Chetty; Vanessa Logan; Serena Schulz; Louise Verity; Matthew Law; Jialun Zhou Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2006-07-06
Authors: Susane Mei Hwang; Luís Gustavo Morato de Toledo; Silvia da Silva Carramão; Armando Brites Frade; Andre Costa Matos; Antonio Pedro Flores Auge Journal: World J Urol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Charles W Nager; Linda Brubaker; Heather J Litman; Halina M Zyczynski; R Edward Varner; Cindy Amundsen; Larry T Sirls; Peggy A Norton; Amy M Arisco; Toby C Chai; Philippe Zimmern; Matthew D Barber; Kimberly J Dandreo; Shawn A Menefee; Kimberly Kenton; Jerry Lowder; Holly E Richter; Salil Khandwala; Ingrid Nygaard; Stephen R Kraus; Harry W Johnson; Gary E Lemack; Marina Mihova; Michael E Albo; Elizabeth Mueller; Gary Sutkin; Tracey S Wilson; Yvonne Hsu; Thomas A Rozanski; Leslie M Rickey; David Rahn; Sharon Tennstedt; John W Kusek; E Ann Gormley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Annemarie van der Steen; Marinus van der Ploeg; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Huub van der Vaart; Jan-Paul W R Roovers Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Thomas Gray; Luned Phillips; Weiguang Li; Charlotte Buchanan; Patrick Campbell; Andrew Farkas; Shahram Abdi; Stephen Radley Journal: Ultrasound Date: 2019-02-26
Authors: Sanne A L van Leijsen; Kirsten B Kluivers; Ben Willem J Mol; Suzan R Broekhuis; Fred L Milani; C Huub van der Vaart; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers; Jan den Boon; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Willem de Leeuw; Viviane Dietz; Jan H Kleinjan; Hans A M Brölmann; Eveline J Roos; Judith Schaafstra; John P F A Heesakkers; Mark E Vierhout Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2009-07-21 Impact factor: 2.809