Literature DB >> 12008812

Value of a complete sonographic survey in detecting fetal abnormalities: correlation with perinatal autopsy.

Lami Yeo1, Edwin R Guzman, Susan Shen-Schwarz, Christine Walters, Anthony M Vintzileos.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sensitivity of using a complete anatomic sonographic survey in detecting fetal abnormalities via correlation with perinatal autopsy results.
METHODS: All perinatal autopsies (1994-2001) with positive findings for at least 1 fetal abnormality and performed by a single perinatal pathologist at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. From these cases, singleton fetuses who received prenatal sonography solely in our unit were identified. The sensitivity of sonography in detecting anomalous fetuses as well as fetal abnormalities and abnormalities by organ system was determined. Abnormalities were classified as major or minor In addition, findings from sonography and autopsy were compared, and their correlation was assigned to 1 of 3 categories.
RESULTS: Of 88 fetuses identified, 85 had 1 or more abnormal structural sonographic findings (sensitivity for fetuses with anomalies, 97%). A total of 372 separate abnormalities were found on autopsy; of the 299 major and 73 minor abnormalities, prenatal sonography showed 224 (75%) and 13 (18%), respectively. There was either complete agreement or only minor differences between sonographic and autopsy findings in 57 (65%) of 88. The sensitivity of sonography in identifying abnormalities was greater than 70% in these systems: central nervous system, cardiac system, urinary system, extremities, genitalia, ribs, and hydrops.
CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, sonography has 97% sensitivity in detecting anomalous fetuses when compared with perinatal autopsy results. Although the sensitivity of sonography in detecting major fetal abnormalities is 75%, the sensitivity for minor abnormalities is poor, even when using a complete anatomic sonographic survey. Although it has limitations, this type of survey is invaluable for both patients and physicians in diagnosing fetal abnormalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12008812     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2002.21.5.501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies by Ultrasound and Its Anatomical Co-relation.

Authors:  Deepali Onkar; Prashant Onkar; Kajal Mitra
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-06-20

2.  Correlation between ultrasound diagnosis and autopsy findings of fetal malformations.

Authors:  Antonella Vimercati; Silvana Grasso; Marinella Abruzzese; Annarosa Chincoli; Alessandra de Gennaro; Angela Miccolis; Gabriella Serio; Luigi Selvaggi; Fabiana Divina Fascilla
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2012-04

3.  Congenital malformations in perinatal autopsies - a study of 100 cases.

Authors:  Uma S Andola; Anita Am; Mukta Ahuja; Sainath K Andola
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11-22

4.  The Spectrum of Congenital Central Nervous System Anomalies Among Stillborn: An Autopsy Based Study.

Authors:  S P Vinutha; D Narayanappa; G V Manjunath; M S Sujatha; M C Sapna Patel; Deepa Bhat
Journal:  Ann Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Second-trimester fetal autopsy: A morphological study with prenatal USG correlations and clinical implications.

Authors:  Chaitra Venkataswamy; Umamaheswari Gurusamy; S Vidhya Lakshmi
Journal:  J Lab Physicians       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.