Literature DB >> 12007553

Screening for pressure ulcer risk in an acute care hospital: development of a brief bedside scale.

Thomas V Perneger1, Anne Claire Raë, Jean Michel Gaspoz, François Borst, Olga Vitek, Céliane Héliot.   

Abstract

To derive a brief bedside pressure ulcer prediction tool for patients admitted to acute care hospitals, we conducted a prospective study of first pressure ulcer incidence among 1,190 consecutive patients hospitalized in selected wards of a Swiss teaching hospital. Baseline predictors included patient age and items from the Norton and Braden ulcer prediction scales. During follow-up, 170 patients developed new pressure ulcers. The predictive ability of baseline assessments decayed over time. Occurrence of first pressure ulcer in the 5 days after admission (129 events) was best predicted by patient age (5 levels), mobility (3 levels), mental status (3 levels), and friction/shear (3 levels). The Fragmment score (sum of friction, age, mobility, mental status) was linearly related to pressure ulcer risk, and its area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.80) was higher than for the Norton (0.74; P = 0.006) and Braden (0.74; P = 0.004) scores. This brief pressure ulcer prediction scale performed well in an acute care setting. Use of this scale may facilitate the implementation of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12007553     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(01)00514-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  12 in total

1.  Surgery duration: Optimized prediction and causality analysis.

Authors:  Orel Babayoff; Onn Shehory; Meishar Shahoha; Ruth Sasportas; Ahuva Weiss-Meilik
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Development of the interRAI Pressure Ulcer Risk Scale (PURS) for use in long-term care and home care settings.

Authors:  Jeff Poss; Katharine M Murphy; M Gail Woodbury; Heather Orsted; Kimberly Stevenson; Gail Williams; Shirley Macalpine; Nancy Curtin-Telegdi; John P Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 3.921

3.  Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?

Authors:  Jan Kottner; Katrin Balzer
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2010-07-23

4.  Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument.

Authors:  S Coleman; J Nixon; J Keen; D Muir; L Wilson; E McGinnis; N Stubbs; C Dealey; E A Nelson
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Exploring the role of pain as an early predictor of category 2 pressure ulcers: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Isabelle L Smith; Sarah Brown; Elizabeth McGinnis; Michelle Briggs; Susanne Coleman; Carol Dealey; Delia Muir; E Andrea Nelson; Rebecca Stevenson; Nikki Stubbs; Lyn Wilson; Julia M Brown; Jane Nixon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).

Authors:  Susanne Coleman; Isabelle L Smith; Elizabeth McGinnis; Justin Keen; Delia Muir; Lyn Wilson; Nikki Stubbs; Carol Dealey; Sarah Brown; E Andrea Nelson; Jane Nixon
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Electrical Stimulation for Pressure Injuries: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-11-08

8.  Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers.

Authors:  Mohit Arora; Lisa A Harvey; Joanne V Glinsky; Lianne Nier; Lucija Lavrencic; Annette Kifley; Ian D Cameron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-01-22

Review 9.  Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Seong-Hi Park; Hea Shoon Lee
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.429

10.  New Morbidity and Comorbidity Scores based on the Structure of the ICD-10.

Authors:  Jürgen Stausberg; Stefan Hagn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.