STUDY OBJECTIVES: Aerosolized iloprost, a stable prostacyclin analog, improves functional capacity even in patients with pulmonary hypertension who did not show a vigorous hemodynamic response after iloprost inhalation at rest. We therefore speculated that aerosolized iloprost elicits more beneficial effects on pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise than at rest. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, open, uncontrolled study at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: Right-heart catheterization at rest and during exercise before and after the inhalation iloprost, 14 to 28 microg. RESULTS: Before iloprost treatment, exercise increased mean (+/- SD) pulmonary artery pressure (PAPm) from 45 +/- 8 to 70 +/- 13 mm Hg, cardiac output from 3.7 +/- 1.0 to 5.8 +/- 2.4 L/min, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from 904 +/- 322 to 1,013 +/- 432 dyne.s.cm(-5) (each p < 0.05). After recovery, iloprost reduced PAPm from 44 +/- 8 to 41 +/- 6 mm Hg, increased cardiac output from 3.7 +/- 1.0 to 4.9 +/- 1.4 L/min, and lowered PVR from 902 +/- 350 to 636 +/- 248 dyne x s x cm(-5) (each p < 0.05). During exercise after iloprost, PAPm increased to 57 +/- 8 mm Hg, cardiac output to 7.0 +/- 3.0 L/min, and PVR to 673 +/- 279 dyne x s x cm(-5) (each p < 0.05 vs first exercise test). Systemic BP was not altered significantly by iloprost treatment during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized iloprost treatment exerts more favorable effects on pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise than at rest. These findings explain the functional improvement observed in patients with pulmonary hypertension who show only a moderate pulmonary vasodilatory response during iloprost inhalation at rest. Whether these beneficial effects have prognostic significance needs to be elucidated by further study.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Aerosolized iloprost, a stable prostacyclin analog, improves functional capacity even in patients with pulmonary hypertension who did not show a vigorous hemodynamic response after iloprost inhalation at rest. We therefore speculated that aerosolized iloprost elicits more beneficial effects on pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise than at rest. DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, open, uncontrolled study at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients with primary or secondary pulmonary hypertension. INTERVENTIONS: Right-heart catheterization at rest and during exercise before and after the inhalation iloprost, 14 to 28 microg. RESULTS: Before iloprost treatment, exercise increased mean (+/- SD) pulmonary artery pressure (PAPm) from 45 +/- 8 to 70 +/- 13 mm Hg, cardiac output from 3.7 +/- 1.0 to 5.8 +/- 2.4 L/min, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from 904 +/- 322 to 1,013 +/- 432 dyne.s.cm(-5) (each p < 0.05). After recovery, iloprost reduced PAPm from 44 +/- 8 to 41 +/- 6 mm Hg, increased cardiac output from 3.7 +/- 1.0 to 4.9 +/- 1.4 L/min, and lowered PVR from 902 +/- 350 to 636 +/- 248 dyne x s x cm(-5) (each p < 0.05). During exercise after iloprost, PAPm increased to 57 +/- 8 mm Hg, cardiac output to 7.0 +/- 3.0 L/min, and PVR to 673 +/- 279 dyne x s x cm(-5) (each p < 0.05 vs first exercise test). Systemic BP was not altered significantly by iloprost treatment during exercise. CONCLUSIONS: Aerosolized iloprost treatment exerts more favorable effects on pulmonary hemodynamics during exercise than at rest. These findings explain the functional improvement observed in patients with pulmonary hypertension who show only a moderate pulmonary vasodilatory response during iloprost inhalation at rest. Whether these beneficial effects have prognostic significance needs to be elucidated by further study.
Authors: Manuel J Richter; Hossein A Ghofrani; Robert Voswinckel; Werner Seeger; Richard Schulz; Frank Reichenberger; Henning Gall Journal: Pulm Circ Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: M Wojewoda; K Przyborowski; B Sitek; A Zakrzewska; L Mateuszuk; J A Zoladz; S Chlopicki Journal: Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol Date: 2016-12-03 Impact factor: 3.000
Authors: Alessandro Bellofiore; Eric Dinges; Robert Naeije; Hamorabi Mkrdichian; Lauren Beussink-Nelson; Melissa Bailey; Michael J Cuttica; Ranya Sweis; James R Runo; Jon G Keevil; Christopher J Francois; Sanjiv J Shah; Naomi C Chesler Journal: Heart Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Ralf Geiger; Axel Kleinsasser; Stephan Meier; Nikolaus Neu; Werner Pajk; Victoria Fischer; Benedict Treml; Joerg I Stein; Alexander Loeckinger Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 17.440