Literature DB >> 12005135

Application of mixed-effects models for exposure assessment.

C Peretz1, A Goren, T Smid, H Kromhout.   

Abstract

The benefits of using linear mixed-effects models for occupational exposure assessment were studied by re-analysing three data sets from two published surveys with repeated exposure measurements. The relative contributions of particular characteristics affecting exposure levels were assessed as in a multiple regression model, while controlling for the correlation between repeated measurements. While one-way ANOVA allows one only to estimate unconditioned variance components, a mixed model enables estimation of between- and within-worker variance components of exposure levels while accounting for the fixed effects of work characteristics. Consequently, we can identify the work characteristics affecting each variance component. Mixed models were applied to the data sets with repeated measurements and auxil iary information on work characteristics. The between-worker variance components were reduced by 35, 66 and 80%, respectively, in the three data sets when work characteristics were taken into account. The within-worker (day-to-day) variability was reduced only in the pig farmer data set, by 25%, when accounting for work activities. In addition, coefficients of work characteristics from the mixed model were compared with coefficients resulting from originally published multiple linear regression models. In the rubber manufacturing data, the coefficients of the mixed model showed similar relative importance, but were generally smaller than the coefficients from regression models. However, in the pig farm data, only the coefficients of work activities were somewhat reduced. The mixed model is a helpful tool for estimating factors affecting exposure and suitable variance components. Identifying the factors in the working environment that affect the between-worker variability facilitates a posteriori grouping of workers into more uniformly exposed groups. Identifying the factors that affect the within-worker variance is helpful for hazard control and in designing efficient sampling schemes with reference to time schedule.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12005135     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/mef009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  19 in total

1.  Cumulative exposure to dust and gases as determinants of lung function decline in tunnel construction workers.

Authors:  B Bakke; B Ulvestad; P Stewart; W Eduard
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Optimization of airborne endotoxin exposure assessment: effects of filter type, transport conditions, extraction solutions, and storage of samples and extracts.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Dick J J Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Identification of determinants of exposure: consequences for measurement and control strategies.

Authors:  A Burdorf
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Agricultural seed dust as a potential cause of organic dust toxic syndrome.

Authors:  L A M Smit; I M Wouters; M M Hobo; W Eduard; G Doekes; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Historical limitations of determinant based exposure groupings in the rubber manufacturing industry.

Authors:  R Vermeulen; H Kromhout
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Selective changes in moral judgment by noninvasive brain stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Paolo Riva; Andrea Manfrinati; Simona Sacchi; Alberto Pisoni; Leonor J Romero Lauro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Spray Drift from Three Airblast Sprayer Technologies in a Modern Orchard Work Environment.

Authors:  Edward J Kasner; Richard A Fenske; Gwen A Hoheisel; Kit Galvin; Magali N Blanco; Edmund Y W Seto; Michael G Yost
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 2.179

8.  Exposure assessment of monoterpenes and styrene: a comparison of air sampling and biomonitoring.

Authors:  I Liljelind; S Rappaport; K Eriksson; J Andersson; I A Bergdahl; A-L Sunesson; B Järvholm
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Effect of extraction and assay media on analysis of airborne endotoxin.

Authors:  Suzanne Spaan; Gert Doekes; Dick Heederik; Peter S Thorne; Inge M Wouters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Predictors of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid exposure among herbicide applicators.

Authors:  Parveen Bhatti; Aaron Blair; Erin M Bell; Nathaniel Rothman; Qing Lan; Dana B Barr; Larry L Needham; Lutzen Portengen; Larry W Figgs; Roel Vermeulen
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 5.563

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.