Literature DB >> 12004212

Budding as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma.

Takashi Okuyama1, Masatoshi Oya, Hiroshi Ishikawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis is an important indicator of tumor stage and prognosis in pT1 and pT2 colorectal adenocarcinomas. Lymphovascular invasion is an established risk factor of lymph node metastasis, whereas budding at the invasive front of tumors is also reported to correlate with lymph node metastasis. We examined whether the coexistence of lymphovascular invasion and budding provides any better information than lymphovascular invasion alone in the prediction of lymph node metastasis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas.
METHODS: Surgically resected specimens of 101 pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas were studied. Using sections stained with hematoxylin-eosin, we examined lymphovascular invasion and budding according to Morodomi's definition.
RESULTS: Lymphovascular invasion was present in 39 lesions (38 percent), whereas budding was found in 42 lesions (41 percent). Budding was more frequently detected in pT2 tumors than in pT1 tumors. The presence of budding significantly correlated with lymphovascular invasion. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of lymphovascular invasion alone for lymph node metastasis were 79, 76, 34, and 96 percent, respectively, whereas those of the combination of lymphovascular invasion and budding (either lymphovascular invasion or budding) were 93, 52, 24, and 98 percent, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Because the risk of lymph node metastasis in pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas having neither lymph node metastasis nor budding is very low, budding in combination with lymphovascular invasion seems to be a simple and inexpensive pathologic marker in predicting lymph node metastasis. Therefore, the presence or absence of budding should be examined in the routine pathologic diagnosis of pT1 or pT2 well-differentiated colorectal adenocarcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12004212     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-6259-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  36 in total

1.  C4.4A is associated with tumor budding and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ryota Oshiro; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Hidekazu Takahashi; Masahisa Ohtsuka; Xin Wu; Junichi Nishimura; Ichiro Takemasa; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Masataka Ikeda; Mitsugu Sekimoto; Nariaki Matsuura; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  Lymph node harvest in colon and rectal cancer: Current considerations.

Authors:  James R McDonald; Andrew G Renehan; Sarah T O'Dwyer; Najib Y Haboubi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-01-27

3.  Practice parameters for early colon cancer management: Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Colo-Rettale; SICCR) guidelines.

Authors:  F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Lymphatic vessel invasion detected by monoclonal antibody D2-40 as a predictor of lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  M Ishii; M Ota; S Saito; Y Kinugasa; S Akamoto; I Ito
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Sentinel lymph node mapping by colonic tattooing: reply.

Authors:  Hanno Spatz; Bruno Märkl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of tumor location on lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Emre Gorgun; Meagan M Costedio; Luca Stocchi; Feza H Remzi; Hermann Kessler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  [Standardized and structured histopathological evaluation of colorectal polyps: a practical checklist against the background of the new WHO classification].

Authors:  G B Baretton; A Tannapfel; W Schmitt
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.011

8.  Transforming growth factor beta can be a parameter of aggressiveness of pT1 colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Katarzyna Guzinska-Ustymowicz; Andrzej Kemona
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Intensity of tumor budding as an index for the malignant potential in invasive rectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Sang-Sik Ha; Hong-Jo Choi; Ki-Jae Park; Jung-Min Kim; Sung-Heun Kim; Young-Hoon Roh; Hyuk-Chan Kwon; Mee-Sook Roh
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 4.679

10.  Down-regulation of the miRNA-200 family at the invasive front of colorectal cancers with degraded basement membrane indicates EMT is involved in cancer progression.

Authors:  Emily L Paterson; Jan Kazenwadel; Andrew G Bert; Yeesim Khew-Goodall; Andrew Ruszkiewicz; Gregory J Goodall
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.715

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.