Literature DB >> 12004173

Diagnosis and management of a metastatic tumor in the atlantoaxial spine.

Mark H Bilsky1, Fintan J Shannon, Scott Sheppard, Vikram Prabhu, Patrick J Boland.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained spine database was conducted.
OBJECTIVES: To review the experience of a large multidisciplinary tertiary referral oncology center in diagnosing and managing metastatic disease of the atlantoaxial spine in the era of magnetic resonance imaging, and to establish treatment parameters. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Published literature on the topic is limited, with conflicting opinions. Although external beam radiation therapy has proven value, some clinicians support aggressive surgical management.
METHODS: This study included all the patients who presented over a 6-year period to Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with metastatic disease to the atlantoaxial spine. Demographics and diagnoses were obtained. Magnetic resonance images, computed tomography scans, and plain radiographs were reviewed. At presentation, patients with normal alignment or minimal subluxation were considered for nonoperative therapy, either external beam radiation therapy or chemotherapy. Surgery was reserved for patients with significant fracture subluxations, including atlantoaxial displacement more than 5 mm or angulation exceeding 11 degrees with displacement more than 3.5 mm. Additional operative indications were prior external beam radiation therapy administered to overlapping spinal ports, unknown primary pain, and persistent pain after nonoperative therapy. Patient outcome was evaluated for pain relief, neurologic outcomes, degree of spine involvement, and survival.
RESULTS: Symptomatic metastatic tumor involving the atlantoaxial spine was diagnosed in 33 patients. The mean age at presentation was 57 years. Histologic diagnoses varied widely. All the patients presented with severe mechanical neck pain, but no patient had myelopathy related to epidural tumor or fracture subluxation. Of these 33 patients, 25 patients initially were treated nonoperatively with either external beam radiation therapy (n = 23) or chemotherapy (n = 2), and 8 patients underwent initial operation. In this nonoperatively treated group, 23 of the 25 patients had significant pain resolution until death or last follow-up assessment. Five patients required subsequent operation: three for significant fracture subluxations and two after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Of the fracture subluxations, two were present before external beam radiation therapy, and one was delayed from rapid tumor progression. Posterior instrumentation was performed in the 13 patients who underwent surgery. No patient required anterior decompression and stabilization. Significant pain resolution was achieved in all the surgically treated patients.
CONCLUSIONS: External beam radiation therapy was used successfully to treat patients with normal alignment or minimal subluxation. Selected patients warrant immediate stabilization. Patients with persistent pain and inability to wean from a hard collar after nonoperative therapy also should be considered for surgery. Posterior stabilization provides pain relief and neurologic preservation or recovery without the need for anterior decompression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12004173     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200205150-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  18 in total

1.  Safety and utility of kyphoplasty prior to spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic tumors: a clinical and dosimetric analysis.

Authors:  Ori Barzilai; Natalie DiStefano; Eric Lis; Yoshiya Yamada; D Michael Lovelock; Andrew N Fontanella; Mark H Bilsky; Ilya Laufer
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2017-11-03

2.  Differentiating malignant vertebral tumours from non-malignancies with CT spectral imaging: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Yan Zhang; Ning Lang; Jianying Li; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  C1-C3 Lateral Mass Screw-Rod Fixation and Fusion for C2 Pathologies and Hangman's Fractures.

Authors:  Forhad Hossain Chowdhury; Mohammod Raziul Haque
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-12-17

Review 4.  Spinal metastasis in the elderly.

Authors:  Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The NOMS framework: approach to the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors.

Authors:  Ilya Laufer; David G Rubin; Eric Lis; Brett W Cox; Michael D Stubblefield; Yoshiya Yamada; Mark H Bilsky
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-05-24

Review 6.  [Tumors and metastases of the upper cervical spine (C0-2). A special challenge].

Authors:  D J Jeszenszky; D Haschtmann; O Pröbstl; F S Kleinstück; C E Heyde; T F Fekete
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  Rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for differentiating spinal osteolytic metastases from spinal infections.

Authors:  Yuan Yuan; Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-02

8.  Stabilization of metastatic lesions affecting the second cervical vertebra.

Authors:  Joseph F Baker; Asseer Shafqat; Aiden Devitt; John P McCabe
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

9.  Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for C1 Osteolytic Lesions via Lateral Approach Under Fluoroscopic Guidance.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Qinghua Tian; Dan Wang; Fei Yi; Hongmei Song; Wenbin Li; Chungen Wu
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.133

Review 10.  Incorporating the Spine Instability Neoplastic Score into a Treatment Strategy for Spinal Metastasis: LMNOP.

Authors:  Zurab Ivanishvili; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2014-04-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.