Literature DB >> 12004081

Modeling stem cell development by retrospective analysis of gene expression profiles in single progenitor-derived colonies.

Neal Madras1, A L Gibbs, Y Zhou, P W Zandstra, Jane E Aubin.   

Abstract

The process of development of various cell types is often based on a linear or deterministic paradigm. This is true, for example, for osteoblast development, a process that occurs through the differentiation of a subset of primitive fibroblast progenitors called colony-forming unit-osteoblasts (CFU-Os). CFU-O differentiation has been subdivided into three stages: proliferation, extracellular matrix development and maturation, and mineralization, with characteristic changes in gene expression at each stage. Few analyses have asked whether CFU-O differentiation, or indeed stem cell differentiation in general, may follow more complex and nondeterministic paths, a possibility that may underlie the substantial number of discrepancies in published reports of progenitor cell developmental sequences. We analyzed 99 single colonies of osteoblast stem/primitive progenitor cells cultured under identical conditions. The colonies were analyzed by global amplification poly(A) polymerase chain reaction to determine which of nine genes had been expressed. We used the expression profiles to develop a statistically rigorous map of the cell fate decisions that occur during osteoprogenitor differentiation and show that different developmental routes can be taken to achieve the same end point phenotype. These routes appear to involve both developmental "dead ends" (leading to the expression of genes not correlated with osteoblast-associated genes or the mature osteoblast phenotype) and developmental flexibility (the existence of multiple gene expression routes to the same developmental end point). Our results provide new insight into the biology of primitive progenitor cell differentiation and introduce a powerful new quantitative method for stem cell lineage analysis that should be applicable to a wide variety of stem cell systems.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12004081     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.20-3-230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  11 in total

Review 1.  The potential of adipose stem cells in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Bettina Lindroos; Riitta Suuronen; Susanna Miettinen
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.739

2.  Changes in the expression of CD106, osteogenic genes, and transcription factors involved in the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells.

Authors:  Feng Liu; Yasuto Akiyama; Sachiko Tai; Kouji Maruyama; Yoshihiro Kawaguchi; Kouji Muramatsu; Ken Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2008-07-04       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Towards predictive models of stem cell fate.

Authors:  Sowmya Viswanathan; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.058

4.  Gene expression by marrow stromal cells in a porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold is affected by pore size and mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Elaine M Byrne; Eric Farrell; Louise A McMahon; Matthew G Haugh; Fergal J O'Brien; Veronica A Campbell; Patrick J Prendergast; Brian C O'Connell
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Differential gene expression in adipose stem cells cultured in allogeneic human serum versus fetal bovine serum.

Authors:  Bettina Lindroos; Kaisa-Leena Aho; Hannu Kuokkanen; Sari Räty; Heini Huhtala; Riina Lemponen; Olli Yli-Harja; Riitta Suuronen; Susanna Miettinen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.845

6.  A three-dimensional scaffold with precise micro-architecture and surface micro-textures.

Authors:  Alvaro Mata; Eun Jung Kim; Cynthia A Boehm; Aaron J Fleischman; George F Muschler; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Functional relationships between genes associated with differentiation potential of aged myogenic progenitors.

Authors:  Radhakrishnan Nagarajan; Sujay Datta; Marco Scutari; Marjorie L Beggs; Greg T Nolen; Charlotte A Peterson
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  NATbox: a network analysis toolbox in R.

Authors:  Shweta S Chavan; Michael A Bauer; Marco Scutari; Radhakrishnan Nagarajan
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Identification of new hematopoietic cell subsets with a polyclonal antibody library specific for neglected proteins.

Authors:  Monica Moro; Mariacristina Crosti; Pasquale Creo; Pierangela Gallina; Serena Curti; Elisa Sugliano; Rossana Scavelli; Davide Cattaneo; Elena Canidio; Maurizio Marconi; Paolo Rebulla; Paolo Sarmientos; Giuseppe Viale; Massimiliano Pagani; Sergio Abrignani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reciprocal regulation of PPARγ and RUNX2 activities in marrow mesenchymal stem cells: Fine balance between p38 MAPK and Protein Phosphatase 5.

Authors:  Lance A Stechschulte; Beata Lecka-Czernik
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2017-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.