Literature DB >> 12003344

Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders.

P M Hocking1, R Bernard, G W Robertson.   

Abstract

1. A 3x2x2 factorial experiment was conducted with boiler breeder females to determine the effects of body weight gain (three levels) and conventional or lower crude protein concentrations in the rations during rearing, and restricted or ad libitum feeding after the peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility, hatchability, mortality and food consumption. 2. Compared with ad libitum feeding, conventional food restriction resulted in a decrease in average daily food consumption of 0.6 during rearing, 0.2 during early lay and an increase of 0.4 after the peak rate of egg production. Mortality was decreased by more than half. 3. Restricted birds had higher total and settable egg production, fewer defective or damaged eggshells and higher fertility and hatchability than those fed ad libitum. The modified (more generous) rearing programme resulted in lower rates of egg production and higher rates of mortality compared with the conventional food restriction programme. 4. Low-protein rearing rations were associated with higher rates of food intake, higher mortalities and lower rates of egg production than the conventional protein rations. There were no differences in the fertility or hatchability of eggs between birds fed on the two concentrations of dietary crude protein. 5. Ad libitum feeding post-peak was associated with higher rates of mortality to 60 weeks of age. Post-peak feeding had little effect on the rate of lay or egg weight in conventionally restricted birds fed high protein rations or in birds fed ad libitum. Restricted feeding post-peak decreased the rate of lay and egg weight in birds on the modified restriction programme and in conventionally restricted birds fed on the low protein rations. There was no effect of post-peak feeding on fertility or hatchability of eggs. 6. The total numbers of saleable chicks per kg food consumed were 1.83, 1.72 and 0.52 for conventional, modified and ad libitum feeding during rearing; 1.56 and 1.15 for restricted and ad libitum feeding post-peak: there were no differences associated with protein concentrations of rations fed during rearing.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12003344     DOI: 10.1080/00071660120109908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  7 in total

1.  Effect of quantitative feed restriction on broiler performance.

Authors:  T L Khetani; T T Nkukwana; M Chimonyo; V Muchenje
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Assessment of growth performance, immune responses, serum metabolites, and prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chicks submitted to early-age water restriction.

Authors:  Mehdi Toghyani; Majid Toghyani; Habib Aghdam Shahryar; Mehdi Zamanizad
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Identification of novel candidate genes for follicle selection in the broiler breeder ovary.

Authors:  Neil A McDerment; Peter W Wilson; David Waddington; Ian C Dunn; Paul M Hocking
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  Exploring the antigenic response to multiplexed immunizations in a chicken model of antibody production.

Authors:  Tina M Kousted; Otto Kalliokoski; Sofie K Christensen; Jakob R Winther; Jann Hau
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2017-03-16

5.  Sex differences in basal hypothalamic anorectic and orexigenic gene expression and the effect of quantitative and qualitative food restriction.

Authors:  S D Caughey; P W Wilson; N Mukhtar; S Brocklehurst; A Reid; R B D'Eath; T Boswell; I C Dunn
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 5.027

6.  The effect of rearing photoperiod on broiler breeder reproductive performance depended on body weight.

Authors:  S A S van der Klein; G Y Bédécarrats; M J Zuidhof
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Gonadotropin Inhibitory Hormone and Its Receptor: Potential Key to the Integration and Coordination of Metabolic Status and Reproduction.

Authors:  Grégoy Y Bédécarrats; Charlene Hanlon; Kazuyoshi Tsutsui
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.