Literature DB >> 12003042

Inguinal hernia: the size of the mesh.

E P Pélissier1.   

Abstract

The size of the mesh used for surgical repair of groin hernias differs significantly from one technique to another. Such differences are not unimportant, since implantation of a large amount of prosthetic material can induce some drawbacks and may perhaps be avoided in many cases. The weak inguinal area, where inguinal hernias are exteriorized, is smaller than the myopectineal orifice, and a mesh 8-9 cm long and 5-6 cm wide is sufficient to cover this area. The results of methods using a small mesh are good, and large patches provide at best the same results with some real drawbacks. A large mesh spread in the preperitoneal space on the bladder and iliac vessels can induce some difficulties in case of further operation on these organs, and when we operate on a man 30 to 50 years old, we ignore whether he may need that kind of operation many years later. Consequently, in most cases a small patch covering only the weak inguinal area is preferable and a large preperitoneal patch should be used only in selected cases at high risk of recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12003042     DOI: 10.1007/s10029-001-0034-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hernia        ISSN: 1248-9204            Impact factor:   4.739


  7 in total

Review 1.  About biomaterials and how they work in groin hernia repairs.

Authors:  R Stoppa
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  Individual mesh size for open anterior inguinal hernia repair: an anthropometric study in Turkish male patients.

Authors:  H Kulacoglu; H Celasin; D Oztuna
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Dimensions of the myopectineal orifice: a human cadaver study.

Authors:  T Wolloscheck; M A Konerding
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Inguinal hernia treatment with the Prolene Hernia System in a Dutch regional training hospital.

Authors:  C A S Berende; J P Ruurda; C E V B Hazenberg; J G Olsman; H J A A van Geffen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: over a thousand convincing reasons to go on.

Authors:  S Balakrishnan; T Singhal; T Samdani; A Hussain; S Shuaib; S Grandy-Smith; J Nicholls; S El-Hasani
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 4.739

6.  Five-year results of inguinal hernia treatment with the Prolene Hernia System in a regional training hospital.

Authors:  D Faraj; J P Ruurda; J G Olsman; H J A A van Geffen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-11-07       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  The preperitoneal memory-ring patch for inguinal hernia: a prospective multicentric feasibility study.

Authors:  F Berrevoet; C Sommeling; S De Gendt; C Breusegem; B de Hemptinne
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2009-02-08       Impact factor: 4.739

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.