Literature DB >> 12002425

Diagnosis of Mycobacterium bovis infection in calves sensitized by mycobacteria of the avium/intracellulare group.

M Amadori1, S Tagliabue, S Lauzi, G Finazzi, G Lombardi, P Teló, L Pacciarini, L Bonizzi.   

Abstract

Because of the frequent exposure of cattle to mycobacteria of the avium/intracellulare group, an investigation was carried out into the possible repercussions thereof on the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis. Three calves from a bovine tuberculosis-free herd, scored avian reactors in the gamma-interferon assay for bovine tuberculosis, were sedated and inoculated endotracheally with a virulent Mycobacterium bovis strain. Then, three other avian reactors were housed with the above donor calves. Mycobacterium bovis was isolated from the nasal swabs of the three endotracheally infected, donor calves. On these samples, TB complex-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests for IS6110 were also positive, albeit with a different time kinetics. The three contact-infected calves showed clear immunological signs of infection; however, their nasal swabs were always PCR-negative and only Mycobacterium avium was isolated. In the endotracheally infected donor calves there was a rise of the gamma-interferon responses to avian and bovine purified protein derivative (PPD) tuberculins, which reached the same stable plateau levels over the whole experiment. The above effect was also observed in the contact-infected calves, even though the response to avian PPD tuberculin always remained at a higher level. By using conventional bovine and avian PPD tuberculins, the comparative intradermal test was generally positive in endotracheally infected, as opposed to contact-infected calves; a positive intradermal test for M. bovis was obtained in two contact-infected calves by different bovine PPD tuberculins based on M. bovis bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) secreted or somatic antigens. It was concluded that M. bovis infection may be concealed for some time in cattle sensitized by mycobacteria of the avium/intracellulare group and that different diagnostic procedures should be adopted for such animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12002425     DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2002.00513.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health        ISSN: 0931-1793


  9 in total

1.  Exposure to Mycobacterium avium induces low-level protection from Mycobacterium bovis infection but compromises diagnosis of disease in cattle.

Authors:  J C Hope; M L Thom; B Villarreal-Ramos; H M Vordermeier; R G Hewinson; C J Howard
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Optimizing antigen cocktails for detection of Mycobacterium bovis in herds with different prevalences of bovine tuberculosis: ESAT6-CFP10 mixture shows optimal sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  C Aagaard; M Govaerts; V Meikle; A J Vallecillo; J A Gutierrez-Pabello; F Suarez-Güemes; J McNair; A Cataldi; C Espitia; P Andersen; J M Pollock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Identification of novel Mycobacterium bovis antigens by dissection of crude protein fractions.

Authors:  V Meikle; A Alito; A S Llera; A Gioffré; A Peralta; B M Buddle; A Cataldi
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2009-07-29

4.  Genomic approach to identification of Mycobacterium bovis diagnostic antigens in cattle.

Authors:  Claus Aagaard; Marc Govaerts; Limei Meng Okkels; Peter Andersen; John M Pollock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Extremophiles and their application to veterinary medicine.

Authors:  Jane A Irwin; Alan W Baird
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 2.146

6.  Performance of immunohistochemistry versus real-time PCR method for detecting mycobacterial infections of cattle ‎ screened by comparative tuberculin test.

Authors:  Mojtaba Ashouri; Hossein Nourani
Journal:  Vet Res Forum       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 0.950

7.  Effects of vaccination against paratuberculosis on tuberculosis in goats: diagnostic interferences and cross-protection.

Authors:  Bernat Pérez de Val; Miquel Nofrarías; Sergio López-Soria; Joseba M Garrido; H Martin Vordermeier; Bernardo Villarreal-Ramos; Maite Martín; Eugenia Puentes; Ramón A Juste; Mariano Domingo
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 8.  A review of risk factors for bovine tuberculosis infection in cattle in the UK and Ireland.

Authors:  J M Broughan; J Judge; E Ely; R J Delahay; G Wilson; R S Clifton-Hadley; A V Goodchild; H Bishop; J E Parry; S H Downs
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.434

9.  Bovine tuberculosis prevalence and risk factors in selected districts of Bangladesh.

Authors:  S K Shaheenur Islam; Tanzida Begum Rumi; S M Lutful Kabir; Adri G M van der Zanden; Vivek Kapur; A K M Anisur Rahman; Michael P Ward; Douwe Bakker; Allen G Ross; Zeaur Rahim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.