Literature DB >> 12002350

Dynamics of brain activation during an explicit word and image recognition task: an electrophysiological study.

Asaid Khateb1, Alan J Pegna, Christoph M Michel, Theodor Landis, Jean-Marie Annoni.   

Abstract

Recent brain imaging studies suggest that semantic processing of words and images may share a common neural network, although modality-specific activation can also be observed. Other studies using event-related potentials (ERPs) report that brain responses to words and images may already differ at approximately 150 ms following stimulus presentation. The question thus remains, which differences are due to perceptual categorization processes and which differences are due to the semantic ones? Using ERP recordings and spatio-temporal source localization analysis, we investigated the dynamics of brain activation during a recognition task. The stimuli consisted of a randomized set of verbal (words vs. non-words) and pictorial items (line drawings of objects vs. scrambled drawings). After each stimulus, subjects had to decide whether it corresponds to a recognizable word or objects. ERP map series were first analyzed in terms of segments of quasi-stable map topography using a cluster analysis. This showed that verbal and pictorial stimuli elicited different field patterns in two time segments between approximately 190-400 ms. Before and after this period, map patterns were similar between verbal and pictorial conditions indicating that the same brain structures were engaged during the early and late steps of processing. Source localization analysis of map segments corresponding to the P100 and the N150 components first showed activation of posterior bilateral regions and then of left temporo-posterior areas. During the period differentiating conditions, other patterns of activation, involving mainly left anterior and posterior regions for words and bilateral posterior regions for images, were observed. These findings suggest that, while sharing an initial common network, recognition of verbal and pictorial stimuli subsequently engage different brain regions during time periods generally allocated to the semantic processing of stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12002350     DOI: 10.1023/a:1014502925003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  7 in total

1.  Visual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: where and when it occurs.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Asaid Khateb; Christoph M Michel; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  A glimpse into your vision.

Authors:  Sara L Gonzalez Andino; Rolando Grave de Peralta; Asaid Khateb; Alan J Pegna; Gregor Thut; Theodor Landis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Evoked alpha and early access to the knowledge system: the P1 inhibition timing hypothesis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Resolving the orthographic ambiguity during visual word recognition in Arabic: an event-related potential investigation.

Authors:  Haitham Taha; Asaid Khateb
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Chronic Pain Patients' Gaze Patterns toward Pain-Related Information: Comparison between Pictorial and Linguistic Stimuli.

Authors:  Jieun Lee; Jaewon Beom; Seoyun Choi; Seulgi Lee; And Jang-Han Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Behavioural and electrophysiological analyses of written word processing in spoken and literary Arabic: New insights into the diglossia question.

Authors:  Samer Andria; Bahaa Madi-Tarabya; Asaid Khateb
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 3.698

7.  Emotional picture and word processing: an FMRI study on effects of stimulus complexity.

Authors:  Lorna H Schlochtermeier; Lars Kuchinke; Corinna Pehrs; Karolina Urton; Hermann Kappelhoff; Arthur M Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.