| Literature DB >> 12002180 |
Jang-Zern Tsai1, James A Will, Scott Hubbard-Van Stelle, Hong Cao, Supan Tungjitkusolmun, Young Bin Choy, Dieter Haemmerich, Vicken R Vorperian, John G Webster.
Abstract
We identified the error sources in a system for measuring tissue resistivity at eight frequencies from 1 Hz to 1 MHz using the four-terminal method. We expressed the measured resistivity with an analytical formula containing all error terms. We conducted practical error measurements with in-vivo and bench-top experiments. We averaged errors at all frequencies for all measurements. The standard deviations of error of the quantization error of the 8-bit digital oscilloscope with voltage averaging, the nonideality of the circuit, the in-vivo motion artifact and electrical interference combined to yield an error of +/- 1.19%. The dimension error in measuring the syringe tube for measuring the reference saline resistivity added +/- 1.32% error. The estimation of the working probe constant by interpolating a set of probe constants measured in reference saline solutions added +/- 0.48% error. The difference in the current magnitudes used during the probe calibration and that during the tissue resistivity measurement caused +/- 0.14% error. Variation of the electrode spacing, alignment, and electrode surface property due to the insertion of electrodes into the tissue caused +/- 0.61% error. We combined the above errors to yield an overall standard deviation error of the measured tissue resistivity of +/- 1.96%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 12002180 DOI: 10.1109/10.995687
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ISSN: 0018-9294 Impact factor: 4.538