Literature DB >> 12002011

Speech-based interaction with in-vehicle computers: the effect of speech-based e-mail on drivers' attention to the roadway.

J D Lee1, B Caven, S Haake, T L Brown.   

Abstract

As computer applications for cars emerge, a speech-based interface offers an appealing alternative to the visually demanding direct manipulation interface. However, speech-based systems may pose cognitive demands that could undermine driving safety. This study used a car-following task to evaluate how a speech-based e-mail system affects drivers' response to the periodic braking of a lead vehicle. The study included 24 drivers between the ages of 18 and 24 years. A baseline condition with no e-mail system was compared with a simple and a complex e-mail system in both simple and complex driving environments. The results show a 30% (310 ms) increase in reaction time when the speech-based system is used. Subjective workload ratings and probe questions also indicate that speech-based interaction introduces a significant cognitive load, which was highest for the complex e-mail system. These data show that a speech-based interface is not a panacea that eliminates the potential distraction of in-vehicle computers. Actual or potential applications of this research include design of in-vehicle information systems and evaluation of their contributions to driver distraction.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12002011     DOI: 10.1518/001872001775870340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Factors        ISSN: 0018-7208            Impact factor:   2.888


  9 in total

1.  Keep your eyes on the road: young driver crash risk increases according to duration of distraction.

Authors:  Bruce G Simons-Morton; Feng Guo; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon P Ehsani; Anuj K Pradhan
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.012

2.  Impact of adolescent media multitasking on cognition and driving safety.

Authors:  Despina Stavrinos; Benjamin McManus; Andrea T Underhill; Maria T Lechtreck
Journal:  Hum Behav Emerg Technol       Date:  2019-04-26

3.  Changes over 12 months in eye glances during secondary task engagement among novice drivers.

Authors:  Fearghal O'Brien; Sheila G Klauer; Johnathon Ehsani; Bruce G Simons-Morton
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2016-05-10

4.  Distracting effect of TV watching on children's reactivity.

Authors:  Carlo V Bellieni; Giulio Fontani; Franco Corradeschi; Lorenzo Iantorno; Marianna Maffei; Silvia Migliorini; Serafina Perrone; Giuseppe Buonocore
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Directing driver attention with augmented reality cues.

Authors:  Michelle L Rusch; Mark C Schall; Patrick Gavin; John D Lee; Jeffrey D Dawson; Shaun Vecera; Matthew Rizzo
Journal:  Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav       Date:  2013-01

6.  Spatial and temporal EEG dynamics of dual-task driving performance.

Authors:  Chin-Teng Lin; Shi-An Chen; Tien-Ting Chiu; Hong-Zhang Lin; Li-Wei Ko
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.262

Review 7.  Use, perceptions, and benefits of automotive technologies among aging drivers.

Authors:  David W Eby; Lisa J Molnar; Liang Zhang; Renée M St Louis; Nicole Zanier; Lidia P Kostyniuk; Sergiu Stanciu
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-19

8.  Talking to your car can drive you to distraction.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Joel M Cooper; Jonna Turrill; James R Coleman; Rachel J Hopman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14

9.  Multi-modal assessment of on-road demand of voice and manual phone calling and voice navigation entry across two embedded vehicle systems.

Authors:  Bruce Mehler; David Kidd; Bryan Reimer; Ian Reagan; Jonathan Dobres; Anne McCartt
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.778

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.