Literature DB >> 12001368

[Practical electron dosimetry. A comparison of different types of ionization chambers].

Oliver S Dohm1, Gunter Christ, Edmund Schüle.   

Abstract

Since Markus chambers are no longer recommended in the 1997 DIN 6800-2 version there are uncertainties as to the use of alternative chamber types for electron dosimetry. Therefore, we performed a comparison between different types of ionization chambers. In particular, the widespread Farmer and Roos chambers were compared with the Markus chamber for polarity effect, chamber-to-chamber variation, and deviations of the measured absorbed dose relative to the value obtained with the Roos chamber (which is regarded as an ideal Bragg-Gray-chamber). The perturbation correction factor at 60Co radiation was determined experimentally as 1,029 +/- 0.5% (Roos chamber) and 1,018 +/- 0.5% (Markus chamber) for the investigated plane-parallel chambers. In addition, we could show that the Roos chambers do not have a larger chamber-to-chamber variation than the Farmer chambers. Likewise, our results suggest that Farmer chambers could be used for electron energies above 6 MeV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12001368     DOI: 10.1016/s0939-3889(15)70540-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Med Phys        ISSN: 0939-3889            Impact factor:   4.820


  1 in total

1.  Study of the uncertainty in the determination of the absorbed dose to water during external beam radiotherapy calibration.

Authors:  Pablo Castro; Feliciano García-Vicente; Cristina Mínguez; Alejandro Floriano; David Sevillano; Leopoldo Pérez; Juan J Torres
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 2.102

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.