Literature DB >> 12000696

Radiation doses in the UK trial of breast screening in women aged 40-48 years.

K C Young1.   

Abstract

Although data have been published on the radiation doses involved in screening women in the UK in the age range 50-64 years, data have not been published for the screening of younger women, when one might expect higher doses and a different risk benefit balance. Therefore, data on the radiation doses arising from screening younger women (age range 40-48 years) as part of the UK age trial have been collected and reviewed. Each of the screening centres participating in the trial was asked to submit measurements of doses for samples of approximately 50 or 100 women. The doses for 2296 women were received. The dose estimates were corrected to take account of variations in composition with age and breast thickness and in the spectra used. The average received dose was 2.5 mGy per oblique film and 2.0 mGy per craniocaudal film. Although these doses are about 7% higher than those calculated for the screening of older women, this was owing to differences in equipment rather than age of the women. Age itself was not found to be a significant factor affecting the dose to screened women aged over or under 50 years. An identifiable sub-group of women with larger breasts who were screened using higher dose systems received doses that were about 4.2 times the average, and should be considered in any risk benefit analysis. Where modern mammography systems with automatic beam quality selection and alternative target and filter materials had been introduced, there was a 15% reduction in average received dose and up to a 50% reduction in received dose for large breasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12000696     DOI: 10.1259/bjr.75.892.750362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Radiation doses received in the United Kingdom breast screening programme in 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  Kenneth C Young; Jennifer M Oduko
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

3.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

4.  Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 years.

Authors:  S Moss; I Thomas; A Evans; B Thomas; L Johns
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Mammographic screening before age 50 years in the UK: comparison of the radiation risks with the mortality benefits.

Authors:  A Berrington de González; G Reeves
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-09-05       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Estimating breast cancer mortality reduction and overdiagnosis due to screening for different strategies in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  N B Gunsoy; M Garcia-Closas; S M Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions.

Authors:  A Sarvazyan; V Egorov; J S Son; C S Kaufman
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2008-07-02

8.  Screening mammography in women aged 40-49: is it time to change?

Authors:  S Helme; N Perry; K Mokbel
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-02-06

Review 9.  Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer?

Authors:  S Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.