Literature DB >> 12000492

'Real world' pragmatic clinical trials: what are they and what do they tell us?

Peter J Helms1.   

Abstract

Although the explanatory clinical therapeutic trial remains the foundation for assessing drug efficacy and is required for licensing purposes, the overall effectiveness of a treatment can be best judged by carefully designed and well conducted pragmatic 'real world' randomized trials. Pragmatic trials seek to inform prescribers and health care planners on the most effective and cost beneficial treatments. Pragmatic trials deserve more attention and should be included in evidence based guidelines for the pharmacological management of common diseases such as asthma and atopy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12000492     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3038.2002.00194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Allergy Immunol        ISSN: 0905-6157            Impact factor:   6.377


  11 in total

1.  Clinical trial results applied to management of the individual cancer patient.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi; Michael A Proschan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Surgical outcomes research based on administrative data: inferior or complementary to prospective randomized clinical trials?

Authors:  Ulrich Guller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Paying for personalized care: cancer biomarkers and comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; David L Veenstra; Josh J Carlson; Louis P Garrison; Scott Ramsey
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 6.603

4.  Patient priorities and the doorknob phenomenon in primary care: Can technology improve disclosure of patient stressors?

Authors:  Marsha N Wittink; Patrick Walsh; Sule Yilmaz; Michael Mendoza; Richard L Street; Benjamin P Chapman; Paul Duberstein
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-08-08

Review 5.  Mesh fixation in endoscopic inguinal hernia repair: evaluation of methodology based on a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Hans Lederhuber; Franziska Stiede; Stephan Axer; Ursula Dahlstrand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Proof of impact and pipeline planning: directions and challenges for social audit in the health sector.

Authors:  Neil Andersson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Effectiveness of joint mobilisation after cast immobilisation for ankle fracture: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial [ACTRN012605000143628].

Authors:  C Christine Lin; Anne M Moseley; Kathryn M Refshauge; Marion Haas; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  The quantity-effect relationship and physiological mechanisms of different acupuncture manipulations on posterior circulation ischemia with vertigo: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shi-Zhe Deng; Xiao-Feng Zhao; Ling-Hui Huang; Si He; Yan Wen; Chao Zhang; Guang Tian; Tian Wang; Fen-Fen Wu; Zhi-Hong Meng; Xue-Min Shi
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care: the struggle between external and internal validity.

Authors:  Marshall Godwin; Lucia Ruhland; Ian Casson; Susan MacDonald; Dianne Delva; Richard Birtwhistle; Miu Lam; Rachelle Seguin
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Effect of a system-oriented intervention on compliance problems in schizophrenia: a pragmatic controlled trial.

Authors:  Hanne Skarsholm; Henrik Stoevring; Bent Nielsen
Journal:  Schizophr Res Treatment       Date:  2014-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.