BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to determine whether beta-blocker treatment (atenolol) improves cardiopulmonary exercise performance and ventilatory response in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. METHODS: A prospective study comparing the results of cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) was performed before and after atenolol therapy in 17 patients in NYHA classes I and II with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed pre-study, and left ventricular diameters, ejection fraction and mitral valve area monitored. CPETs (Naughton protocol) were performed by two different investigators before and after one-week atenolol therapy (50 mg/day). The second investigator was blinded to the result of the baseline test. O2 consumption, CO2 production, ventilatory parameters and respiratory exchange ratios were measured on line. RESULTS: Maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) did not differ significantly before and after beta-blockade (median 16.8 and 15.0 ml/kg/min, respectively. Median heart rate at rest (72 versus 55 beats/min; p = 0.0003) and during peak exercise (153 versus 105 beats/min; p = 0.0003), and anaerobic threshold (10 versus 8.9 ml/kg/min; p = 0.02) were lower with beta-blockade compared with the baseline state. Minute ventilation at maximum exercise (41 versus 40 l/min) and ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (34 versus 35) were unchanged with atenolol therapy, indicating no improvement in ventilatory performance. When patients were grouped into those in whom VO2max was improved with atenolol therapy (n = 7) and those in whom it was impaired (n = 10), there were no inter-group differences with respect to age, left ventricular function, severity of mitral stenosis, NYHA class and grade of beta-blockade reached. Four patients felt symptomatically worse during atenolol treatment (lower NYHA functional class). CONCLUSION: Beta-blockade does not improve exercise tolerance in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. In addition, ventilatory performance does not change with treatment.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to determine whether beta-blocker treatment (atenolol) improves cardiopulmonary exercise performance and ventilatory response in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. METHODS: A prospective study comparing the results of cardiopulmonary exercise tests (CPETs) was performed before and after atenolol therapy in 17 patients in NYHA classes I and II with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed pre-study, and left ventricular diameters, ejection fraction and mitral valve area monitored. CPETs (Naughton protocol) were performed by two different investigators before and after one-week atenolol therapy (50 mg/day). The second investigator was blinded to the result of the baseline test. O2 consumption, CO2 production, ventilatory parameters and respiratory exchange ratios were measured on line. RESULTS: Maximal O2 uptake (VO2max) did not differ significantly before and after beta-blockade (median 16.8 and 15.0 ml/kg/min, respectively. Median heart rate at rest (72 versus 55 beats/min; p = 0.0003) and during peak exercise (153 versus 105 beats/min; p = 0.0003), and anaerobic threshold (10 versus 8.9 ml/kg/min; p = 0.02) were lower with beta-blockade compared with the baseline state. Minute ventilation at maximum exercise (41 versus 40 l/min) and ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (34 versus 35) were unchanged with atenolol therapy, indicating no improvement in ventilatory performance. When patients were grouped into those in whom VO2max was improved with atenolol therapy (n = 7) and those in whom it was impaired (n = 10), there were no inter-group differences with respect to age, left ventricular function, severity of mitral stenosis, NYHA class and grade of beta-blockade reached. Four patients felt symptomatically worse during atenolol treatment (lower NYHA functional class). CONCLUSION: Beta-blockade does not improve exercise tolerance in patients with mitral stenosis in sinus rhythm. In addition, ventilatory performance does not change with treatment.
Authors: Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; José Maria Peixoto; José Elias Soares Pinheiro; Abrahão Afiune Neto; Afonso Luiz Tavares de Albuquerque; Álvaro César Cattani; Amit Nussbacher; Ana Amelia Camarano; Angela Hermínia Sichinels; Antonio Carlos Sobral Sousa; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar Filho; Claudia F Gravina; Dario Celestino Sobral Filho; Eduardo Pitthan; Elisa Franco de Assis Costa; Elizabeth da Rosa Duarte; Elizabete Viana de Freitas; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Evandro Tinoco Mesquita; Fábio Fernandes; Gilson Soares Feitosa; Humberto Pierre; Ilnei Pereira Filho; Izo Helber; Jairo Lins Borges; Jéssica Myrian de Amorim Garcia; José Antonio Gordillo de Souza; José Carlos da Costa Zanon; Josmar de Castro Alves; Kalil Lays Mohallem; Laura Mariana de Siqueira Mendonça Chaves; Lídia Ana Zytynski Moura; Márcia Cristina Amélia da Silva; Maria Alice de Vilhena Toledo; Maria Elisa Lucena Sales de Melo Assunção; Mauricio Wajngarten; Mauro José Oliveira Gonçalves; Neuza Helena Moreira Lopes; Nezilour Lobato Rodrigues; Paulo Roberto Pereira Toscano; Pedro Rousseff; Ricardo Antonio Rosado Maia; Roberto Alexandre Franken; Roberto Dischinger Miranda; Roberto Gamarski; Ronaldo Fernandes Rosa; Silvio Carlos de Moraes Santos; Siulmara Cristina Galera; Stela Maris da Silva Grespan; Teresa Cristina Rogerio da Silva; William Antonio de Magalhães Esteves Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2019-06-06 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: John Daniel A Ramos; Elleen L Cunanan; Lauro L Abrahan; Marc Denver A Tiongson; Felix Eduardo R Punzalan Journal: Cardiol Res Date: 2018-08-10