Literature DB >> 11999862

Ideomotor compatibility in the psychological refractory period effect: 29 years of oversimplification.

Mei-Ching Lien1, Robert W Proctor, Philip A Allen.   

Abstract

Four experiments examined whether the psychological refractory period (PRP) effect can be eliminated with ideomotor compatible (IM) but not stimulus-response compatible (SR) tasks, as reported by A. G. Greenwald and H. G. Shulman (1973). Their tasks were used: a left or right movement to a left- or right-pointing arrow (IM) or to the word left or right (SR) for Task 1; saying "A" or "B" (IM) or "1" or "2" (SR) to an auditory A or B for Task 2. The stimulus onset asynchronies were 0, 100, 200, 300, 500, and 1,000 ms in Experiment 1, and only 0, 100, 200, and 1,000 ms in Experiments 2-4. The arrow was in the center of the screen in Experiments 1-3 and to the left or right in Experiment 4. As in Greenwald and Shulman's Experiment 2, the instructions stated that most often the 2 stimuli would be presented simultaneously. A PRP effect was obtained in all conditions, most likely because response-selection decisions are required even for IM tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999862     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.28.2.396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  13 in total

1.  Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects.

Authors:  Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-11-22

Review 2.  Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

3.  Investigation on the improvement and transfer of dual-task coordination skills.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Peter A Frensch; Alexander Soutschek; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-09-27

4.  Is the psychological refractory period effect for ideomotor compatible tasks eliminated by speed-stress instructions?

Authors:  Yun Kyoung Shin; Yang Seok Cho; Mei-Ching Lien; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-05-23

5.  Evidence for graded central processing resources in a sequential movement task.

Authors:  Willem B Verwey; Elger L Abrahamse; Elian De Kleine; Marit F L Ruitenberg
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-02-09

6.  How does practice reduce dual-task interference: integration, automatization, or just stage-shortening?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Mark Van Selst; James C Johnston; Roger Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-11-17

7.  Bypassing the central bottleneck with easy tasks: Beyond ideomotor compatibility.

Authors:  Morgan Lyphout-Spitz; François Maquestiaux; Eric Ruthruff
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-11-09

8.  Ideomotor compatibility enables automatic response selection.

Authors:  François Maquestiaux; Morgan Lyphout-Spitz; Eric Ruthruff; Mahé Arexis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08

9.  Partial repetition between action plans delays responses to ideomotor compatible stimuli.

Authors:  Lisa R Fournier; Benjamin P Richardson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-19

10.  Electrophysiological evidence for adult age-related sparing and decrements in emotion perception and attention.

Authors:  Joshua W Pollock; Nadia Khoja; Kevin P Kaut; Mei-Ching Lien; Philip A Allen
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.