Literature DB >> 11999769

Preliminary examination of contaminant loadings in farmed salmon, wild salmon and commercial salmon feed.

M D L Easton1, D Luszniak, Geest E Von der.   

Abstract

This pilot study examined five commercial salmon feeds, four farmed salmon (one Atlantic, three chinooks) and four wild salmon (one chinook, one chum, two sockeyes) from the Pacific Coast for PCBs (112 congeners), polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs - 41 congeners), 25 organochlorine pesticides (OPs), 20 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and methyl and inorganic mercury. The farmed salmon showed consistently higher levels of PCBs, PBDEs, OPs (except toxaphene) than the wild salmon. The mean concentrations in pg/g were 51,216 vs 5302 for total PCBs; 2668 vs 178 for total PBDEs; 41,796 vs 12,164 for total OPs (except toxaphene). The farmed salmon levels are likely a consequence of the elevated level of contamination found in the commercial salmon feed (mean concentrations in pg/g were 65,535 for total PCBs; 1889 for total BPDEs; 48,124 for total OPs except toxaphene). Except for a single high wild chinook value, PAHs were highest in the feed samples followed by the farmed fish and the three other wild fish. The Bio-Oregon-1996 feed of hatchery origin showed a level of PAHs ten times higher than any other feed. The genotoxic implications of such a high PAH level are considered for juvenile chinook salmon. Toxaphene and methyl mercury concentrations were not notably different between the wild and farmed salmon. There was no clear low contaminant brand of salmon feed. The human health implications of eating farmed salmon are considered from the perspective of the current WHO and Health Canada (2000) tolerable daily intake (TDI) values for PCBs. Based on a TDI of 1 pg TEQ/kg bw/day, this analysis indicated a safety concern for individuals who on a regular weekly basis consume farmed salmon produced from contaminated feed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999769     DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(01)00136-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  10 in total

1.  Maternal transfer of xenobiotics and effects on larval striped bass in the San Francisco Estuary.

Authors:  David J Ostrach; Janine M Low-Marchelli; Kai J Eder; Shaleah J Whiteman; Joe G Zinkl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Assessing pollutant exposure in cultured and wild sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) from the Iberian Peninsula.

Authors:  Denise Fernandes; Maria João Bebianno; Cinta Porte
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-07-11       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Polychlorinated biphenyls in farmed and wild Onchorhynchus kisutch and Onchorhynchus mykiss from the Chilean Patagonia.

Authors:  Monica Montory; Evelyn Habit; Paulina Bahamonde; Pilar Fernandez; Joan O Grimalt; Katia Saez; Ignacio Rudolph; Ricardo Barra
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Induction patterns of new CYP1 genes in environmentally exposed rainbow trout.

Authors:  Maria E Jönsson; Kai Gao; Jan A Olsson; Jared V Goldstone; Ingvar Brandt
Journal:  Aquat Toxicol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Contaminant exposure in outmigrant juvenile salmon from Pacific Northwest estuaries of the United States.

Authors:  Lyndal L Johnson; Gina M Ylitalo; Mary R Arkoosh; Anna N Kagley; Coral Stafford; Jennie L Bolton; Jon Buzitis; Bernadita F Anulacion; Tracy K Collier
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Developmental exposure to PCBs and/or MeHg: effects on a differential reinforcement of low rates (DRL) operant task before and after amphetamine drug challenge.

Authors:  Helen J K Sable; Paul A Eubig; Brian E Powers; Victor C Wang; Susan L Schantz
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 3.763

Review 7.  A quantitative synthesis of mercury in commercial seafood and implications for exposure in the United States.

Authors:  Roxanne Karimi; Timothy P Fitzgerald; Nicholas S Fisher
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Changes of biomarkers with oral exposure to benzo(a)pyrene, phenanthrene and pyrene in rats.

Authors:  Hwan Goo Kang; Sang Hee Jeong; Myung Haing Cho; Joon Hyoung Cho
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.672

Review 9.  What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health.

Authors:  Amy R Sapkota; Lisa Y Lefferts; Shawn McKenzie; Polly Walker
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Consumption habits of pregnant women and implications for developmental biology: a survey of predominantly Hispanic women in California.

Authors:  Sarah E Santiago; Grace H Park; Kelly J Huffman
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.271

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.