Literature DB >> 11999591

Clinical perception of phantom limb sensation in patients with brachial plexus block.

M E Gentili1, C Verton, B Kinirons, F Bonnet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Patients' perception of limb position during regional anaesthesia is frequently incorrect. The incidence and nature of this phenomenon has not yet been completely described. The aim of this prospective study was to assess phantom sensation in patients undergoing a brachial plexus block.
METHODS: Axillary block was performed in 81 patients with the aid of a peripheral nerve stimulator. Immediately after the block, patients were allocated randomly to two groups (Group 1, n = 40; Group 2, n = 41) to have the blocked limb placed either on their thorax or in abduction. Fifteen minutes later, when the block was complete, the position of the limb was changed, without the knowledge of the patient, to a new position of abduction and flexion of the forearm. Patients were questioned about the new limb position. Fifteen minutes later, the limb was then transiently shown to the patient and further placed 'blindly' to another position. Patients were once more questioned about this new position.
RESULTS: Correct perception was more frequently observed in both groups following the first interview. Thirty-two and 34 patients gave at least one erroneous response about their limb position when it was initially placed on the thorax or in abduction respectively. Transient visualization of the limb position did not improve the rate of correct response.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perception of the position of the limb after axillary block in the majority of instances was probably due to persisting sensory inputs from the shoulder joint, which is not involved in this block. This is in contrast to supraclavicular or interscalene blocks. A significant number of patients experienced phantom limb sensation. They reported an arm position in fact related to the position of their arm before the axillary block.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999591     DOI: 10.1017/s0265021502000182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the perceived posture of the hand during ischaemic anaesthesia of the arm.

Authors:  N Inui; L D Walsh; J L Taylor; S C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  A review of current theories and treatments for phantom limb pain.

Authors:  Kassondra L Collins; Hannah G Russell; Patrick J Schumacher; Katherine E Robinson-Freeman; Ellen C O'Conor; Kyla D Gibney; Olivia Yambem; Robert W Dykes; Robert S Waters; Jack W Tsao
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Systematic changes in the perceived posture of the wrist and elbow during formation of a phantom hand and arm.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Inui; Junya Masumoto; Yuki Ueda; Kazuhiro Ide
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Common coding and dynamic interactions between observed, imagined, and experienced motor and somatosensory activity.

Authors:  Laura K Case; Jaime Pineda; Vilayanur S Ramachandran
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Role of Potassium Ions Quantum Tunneling in the Pathophysiology of Phantom Limb Pain.

Authors:  Mustafa Alrabayah; Abdallah Barjas Qaswal; Aiman Suleiman; Lubna Khreesha
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-18

6.  Phantom limb syndrome induced by combined spinal and epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing elective open gynecological surgery.

Authors:  Huan Wang; Yingjie Geng; Weijian Zheng; Weiping Fang; Erwei Gu; Xuesheng Liu; Wenzhi Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Bridging the Translational Divide in Pain Research: Biological, Psychological and Social Considerations.

Authors:  Chulmin Cho; Harashdeep K Deol; Loren J Martin
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.