Literature DB >> 11999261

Hindsight bias in medicolegal expert reports.

Thomas B Hugh1, G Douglas Tracy.   

Abstract

Malpractice litigation is now a substantial cost in the provision of healthcare. Despite new attitudes of Australian courts towards medical evidence, expert reports remain the cornerstone of most medical negligence cases. There is evidence that hindsight bias, which may cause the expert to simplify, trivialise and criticise retrospectively the decisions of the treating doctor, is inevitable when the expert knows there has been an adverse outcome. If possible, outcome information should be withheld from experts providing reports. If outcome information is not withheld, courts should be made aware of the probability of hindsight bias.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11999261     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

Review 1.  Nature of human error: implications for surgical practice.

Authors:  Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Medical Negligence Determinations, the "Right to Try," and Expanded Access to Innovative Treatments.

Authors:  Denise Meyerson
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Quality Review in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Reiss; Sarah Jarmain; Kamini Vasudev
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Hindsight bias critically impacts on clinicians' assessment of care quality in retrospective case note review.

Authors:  Edward Banham-Hall; Sian Stevens
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 2.659

5.  Patient assessments of a hypothetical medical error: effects of health outcome, disclosure, and staff responsiveness.

Authors:  A Cleopas; A Villaveces; A Charvet; P A Bovier; V Kolly; T V Perneger
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2006-04

6.  Medico-Legal Cases Involving Cardiologists and Cardiac Test Underuse or Overuse.

Authors:  Lisa A Calder; Heather K Neilson; Eileen M Whyte; Jun Ji; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 7.  What do family physicians consider an error? A comparison of definitions and physician perception.

Authors:  Nancy C Elder; Harini Pallerla; Saundra Regan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-12-08       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Intraoperative injuries from abdominopelvic surgery: an analysis of national medicolegal data.

Authors:  Guylaine Lefebvre; Kirsten A Devenny; Diane L Héroux; Cara L Bowman; Heather K Neilson; Richard Mimeault; Sukhbir S Singh; Lisa A Calder
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Five-year clinical outcomes with endoscopic transforaminal outside-in foraminoplasty techniques for symptomatic degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski; Nicholas A Ransom
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01

10.  Five-year clinical outcomes with endoscopic transforaminal foraminoplasty for symptomatic degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine: a comparative study of inside-out versus outside-in techniques.

Authors:  Anthony Yeung; Kai-Uwe Lewandrowski
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.