Literature DB >> 11997762

Growth and treatment changes in patients treated with a headgear-activator appliance.

Margareta Bendeus1, Urban Hägg, Bakr Rabie.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate growth and treatment changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated with a combined headgear-activator appliance. The sample consisted of 20 consecutive male patients treated with headgear-activator. Their compliance was checked after 2 months of treatment, and 3 patients dropped out. Lateral cephalograms, obtained 6 months before treatment, at the start of treatment, after 6 and 12 months of treatment, and 24 months after treatment, were analyzed by the method of Pancherz. The results disclosed that during growth, on average, overjet, molar relationship, and jaw-base relationship improved, and the mandibular incisors became retruded; the changes were statistically significant over a 2-year period. There was no significant change in the overbite. During the 12 months of treatment, there was no maxillary forward growth, and the jaw relationship improved (P <.001) because of forward growth of the mandible (P <.001). The molar relationship and the overbite improved (P <.001). Significant treatment effects included reduction in overjet (P <.001) and overbite (P <.01), and improvement of jaw-base (P <.05) and molar (P <.001) relationships. There was significant restraint of maxillary forward growth (P <.05). The eruption of the maxillary incisors and molars was restrained (P <.05). The average basic growth pattern in Class II Division 1 malocclusion resulted in small favorable changes in overjet, molar relationship, and jaw-base relationship. The main effect of the headgear-activator appliance was a favorable dental change, limited to restraint of maxillary forward growth but not affecting the vertical dimension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997762     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.122177

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance in patients with Class II skeletal malocclusions.

Authors:  Marcelo N Kegler Pangrazio; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeffrey L Berger; Burcu Bayirli; Amin Movahhedian
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The biological mechanisms of PCNA and BMP in TMJ adaptive remodeling.

Authors:  Zoe Potres Barnouti; Payam Owtad; Gang Shen; Peter Petocz; M Ali Darendeliler
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Occlusal plane canting reduction accompanies mandibular counterclockwise rotation in camouflaging treatment of hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Rui Ye; Yu Li; Xue Li; Juan Li; Jue Wang; Sen Zhao; Zhihe Zhao
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Change of mandibular position during two-phase orthodontic treatment of skeletal class II in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Rhonda Nga Yi Cheung; Urban Hägg; Ricky Wing Kit Wong; Chongshan Liao; Yanqi Yang
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-01-28

5.  Camouflage treatment guided by facial improvement in hyperdivergent skeletal class II malocclusion.

Authors:  Huijuan Wang; Li Jiang; Yating Yi; Huang Li; Tingting Lan
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2022-02

Review 6.  New therapeutics in promoting and modulating mandibular growth in cases with mandibular hypoplasia.

Authors:  Tarek El-Bialy; Adel Alhadlaq
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Does the degree of advancement during functional appliance therapy matter?

Authors:  A Bakr M Rabie; Abdullah Al-Kalaly
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 3.075

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.