Literature DB >> 11997686

Spatial coincidence modulates interaction between visual and somatosensory evoked potentials.

Martin Schürmann1, Vasil Kolev, Kristina Menzel, Juliana Yordanova.   

Abstract

The time course of interaction between concurrently applied visual and somatosensory stimulation with respect to evoked potentials (EPs) was studied. Visual stimuli, either in the left or right hemifield, and electric stimuli to the left wrist were delivered either alone or simultaneously. Visual and somatosensory EPs were summed and compared to bimodal EPs (BiEP, response to actual combination of both modalities). Temporal coincidence of stimuli lead to sub-additive or over-additive amplitudes in BiEPs in several time windows between 75 and 275 ms. Additional effects of spatial coincidence (left wrist with left hemifield) were found between 75 and 300 ms and beyond 450 ms. These interaction effects hint at a temporo-spatial pattern of multiple brain areas participating in the process of multimodal integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997686     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200205070-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  12 in total

Review 1.  On the use of superadditivity as a metric for characterizing multisensory integration in functional neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Paul J Laurienti; Thomas J Perrault; Terrence R Stanford; Mark T Wallace; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Intracranial cortical responses during visual-tactile integration in humans.

Authors:  Brian T Quinn; Chad Carlson; Werner Doyle; Sydney S Cash; Orrin Devinsky; Charles Spence; Eric Halgren; Thomas Thesen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Crossmodal influences in somatosensory cortex: Interaction of vision and touch.

Authors:  Jennifer K Dionne; Sean K Meehan; Wynn Legon; W Richard Staines
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Modality shift effects mimic multisensory interactions: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Matthias Gondan; Dirk Vorberg; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Multisensory integration across the senses in young and old adults.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Po Ching Clara Li; Mooyeon Oh-Park; Joe Verghese; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Visual-Somatosensory Integration is Linked to Physical Activity Level in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Kristina Dumas; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.286

7.  Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: evidence for response conflict.

Authors:  Bettina Forster; Enea F Pavone
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Visual-somatosensory integration and balance: evidence for psychophysical integrative differences in aging.

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Roee Holtzer; Joe Verghese
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.286

9.  Visual-somatosensory integration in aging: does stimulus location really matter?

Authors:  Jeannette R Mahoney; Cuiling Wang; Kristina Dumas; Roee Holtzer
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  The effect of unpredicted visual feedback on activation in the secondary somatosensory cortex during movement execution.

Authors:  Toshiaki Wasaka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.