Literature DB >> 11997559

Peritoneal metastases: detection with spiral CT in patients with ovarian cancer.

Fergus V Coakley1, Patricia H Choi, Christina A Gougoutas, Bhavana Pothuri, Ennapadam Venkatraman, Dennis Chi, Antonina Bergman, Hedvig Hricak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of spiral computed tomography (CT) in the depiction of peritoneal metastases by using surgical findings in patients with ovarian cancer as the standard of reference.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three independent readers reviewed the preoperative CT scans obtained in 64 patients who underwent primary surgery for ovarian cancer. Readers rated the likelihood of peritoneal metastases on a five-point scale and recorded the presence or absence of ascites, parietal peritoneal thickening or enhancement, and small-bowel wall thickening or distortion. Peritoneal metastases were identified as nodular, plaquelike, or infiltrative soft-tissue lesions in the peritoneal fat or on the peritoneal surface. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was calculated for each reader. Interreader agreement was evaluated with the kappa statistic. Descriptive statistical data were determined with dichotomized ratings (1-3 = absent; 4-5 = present).
RESULTS: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the three readers were 0.95, 0.93, and 0.89. Paired kappa values ranged from 0.75 to 0.91. Reader sensitivity for metastases 1 cm or smaller in maximum diameter (25%-50%) was significantly (P <.05) lower than overall sensitivity (85%-93%). Ascites, parietal peritoneal thickening or enhancement, and small-bowel wall thickening or distortion demonstrated positive predictive values of 72%-93%, with kappa values of 0.12-0.80.
CONCLUSION: Spiral CT is accurate in the depiction of peritoneal metastases from ovarian cancer, although sensitivity is reduced in patients with tumor implants 1 cm or smaller. Ancillary signs of peritoneal malignancy are limited by low interobserver agreement. Copyright RSNA, 2002

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997559     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2232011081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  68 in total

1.  Pre-operative evaluation of peritoneal deposits using multidetector computed tomography in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  S H Chandrashekhara; S Thulkar; D N Srivastava; L Kumar; R Hariprasad; S Kumar; M C Sharma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  ESUR guidelines: ovarian cancer staging and follow-up.

Authors:  Rosemarie Forstner; Evis Sala; Karen Kinkel; John A Spencer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Peritoneal sarcoidosis: the role of imaging in diagnosis.

Authors:  Meghan G Lubner; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2009-12

4.  Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography for Preoperative Staging of Patients with Non-endometrioid Carcinomas of the Uterine Corpus.

Authors:  Yulia Lakhman; Seth S Katz; Debra A Goldman; Derya Yakar; Hebert A Vargas; Ramon E Sosa; Maura Miccò; Robert A Soslow; Hedvig Hricak; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Evis Sala
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Cross-sectional Imaging of Gallbladder Carcinoma: An Update.

Authors:  Naveen Kalra; Pankaj Gupta; Manphool Singhal; Rajesh Gupta; Vikas Gupta; Radhika Srinivasan; Bhagwant R Mittal; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2018-04-30

6.  Advanced Primary Epithelial Ovarian and Peritoneal Carcinoma-Does Diagnostic Accuracy of Preoperative CT Scan for Detection of Peritoneal Metastatic Sites Reflect into Prediction of Suboptimal Debulking? A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Kiran Bagul; D K Vijaykumar; Anupama Rajanbabu; Mitchelle Aline Antony; Venkatesan Ranganathan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-18

Review 7.  Imaging ovarian cancer and peritoneal metastases--current and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Stavroula Kyriazi; Stan B Kaye; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted sequence for staging of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: a clinical feasibility study in comparison to CT and FDG-PET/CT.

Authors:  Katrijn Michielsen; Ignace Vergote; Katya Op de Beeck; Frederic Amant; Karin Leunen; Philippe Moerman; Christophe Deroose; Geert Souverijns; Steven Dymarkowski; Frederik De Keyzer; Vincent Vandecaveye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Correlation between Surgeon's assessment and radiographic evaluation of residual disease in women with advanced stage ovarian cancer reported to have undergone optimal surgical cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  Ramez N Eskander; James Kauderer; Krishnansu S Tewari; Robert S Mannel; Robert E Bristow; David M O'Malley; Stephen C Rubin; Gretchen E Glaser; Chad A Hamilton; Keiichi Fujiwara; Warner K Huh; Frederick Ueland; Jean-Marie Stephan; Robert A Burger
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  The utility and cost of routine follow-up procedures in the surveillance of ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a 16-year institutional review.

Authors:  N B Rettenmaier; C R Rettenmaier; T Wojciechowski; L N Abaid; J V Brown; J P Micha; B H Goldstein
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.