Literature DB >> 11997480

Specific aneusomies in Chinese hamster cells at different stages of neoplastic transformation, initiated by nitrosomethylurea.

Alice Fabarius1, Andreas Willer, George Yerganian, Ruediger Hehlmann, Peter Duesberg.   

Abstract

Aneuploidy is ubiquitous in cancer, and its phenotypes are inevitably dominant and abnormal. In view of these facts we recently proposed that aneuploidy is sufficient for carcinogenesis generating cancer-specific aneusomies via a chain reaction of autocatalytic aneuploidizations. According to this hypothesis a carcinogen initiates carcinogenesis via a random aneuploidy. Aneuploidy then generates transformation stage-specific aneusomies and further random aneusomies autocatalytically, because it renders chromosome segregation and repair mechanisms error-prone. The hypothesis predicts that several specific aneusomies can cause the same cancers, because several chromosomes also cooperate in normal differentiation. Here we describe experiments on the Chinese hamster (CH) that confirm this hypothesis. (i) Random aneuploidy was detected before transformation in up to 90% of CH embryo cells treated with the carcinogen nitrosomethylurea (NMU). (ii) Several specific aneusomies were found in 70-100% of the aneuploid cells from colonies transformed with NMU in vitro and from tumors generated by NMU-transformed cells in syngeneic animals. Among the aneuploid in vitro transformed cells, 79% were trisomic for chromosome 3, and 59% were monosomic for chromosome 10, compared with 8% expected for random distribution of any aneusomy among the 12 CH chromosomes. Moreover, 52% shared both trisomy 3 and monosomy 10 compared with 0.6% expected for random distribution of any two aneusomies. Among the tumor cells, 65% were trisomic for chromosome 3, 51% were trisomic for chromosome 5, and 30% shared both trisomies. Aneuploid cells without these specific aneusomies may contain minor transformation-specific aneusomies or may be untransformed. (iii) Random aneusomies and structurally altered chromosomes increased with the generations of transformed cells to the point where their origins became unidentifiable in tumors. We conclude that specific aneusomies are necessary for carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997480      PMCID: PMC124479          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.251670699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

1.  Mutagenesis and transformation of normal cells by chemical carcinogens.

Authors:  E Huberman; R Mager; L Sachs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Analysis of karyotype variation following carcinogen treatment of Chinese hamster primary cell lines.

Authors:  J R Connell; C H Ockey
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1977-11-15       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Identification of cytogenetic subgroups and karyotypic pathways in transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  M Höglund; T Säll; S Heim; F Mitelman; N Mandahl; I Fadl-Elmula
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Ciromosomal control of reversion in transformed cells.

Authors:  S Hitotsumachi; Z Rabinowitz; L Sachs
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1971-06-25       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Bloom's syndrome. III. Analysis of the chromosome aberration characteristic of this disorder.

Authors:  J German; L P Crippa; D Bloom
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1974       Impact factor: 4.316

6.  Annotation: genetic effects of aneuploidy.

Authors:  L Sandler; F Hecht
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  D L Lindsley; L Sandler; B S Baker; A T Carpenter; R E Denell; J C Hall; P A Jacobs; G L Miklos; B K Davis; R C Gethmann; R W Hardy; A H Steven; M Miller; H Nozawa; D M Parry; M Gould-Somero; M Gould-Somero
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Identification of a chromosome that controls malignancy in Chinese hamster cells.

Authors:  N Bloch-Shtacher; L Sachs
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.384

9.  Simple numeric abnormalities as primary karyotype changes in ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  F H Thompson; Y Liu; J Emerson; R Weinstein; R Makar; J M Trent; R Taetle; D S Alberts
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Chemical transformation of Chinese hamster cells: II. Appearance of marker chromosomes in transformed cells.

Authors:  D J Kirkland; S Venitt
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chromosome 11 aneusomy in esophageal cancers and precancerous lesions--an early event in neoplastic transformation: an interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization study from south India.

Authors:  Vasavi Mohan; Shivani Ponnala; Hemakumar M Reddy; Radha Sistla; Rachel A Jesudasan; Yog Raj Ahuja; Qurratulain Hasan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Prognostic importance of additional cytogenetic anomalies in chronic myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Sureyya Bozkurt; Burak Uz; Yahya Buyukasik; Ozlen Bektas; Ayten Inanc; Hakan Goker; Emin Kansu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  A mechanistic model for genetic machinery of ontogenetic growth.

Authors:  Rongling Wu; Zuoheng Wang; Wei Zhao; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic and biological subgroups of low-stage follicular thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Christopher A French; Erik K Alexander; Edmund S Cibas; Vania Nose; Julia Laguette; William Faquin; Jeff Garber; Francis Moore; Jonathan A Fletcher; P Reed Larsen; Todd G Kroll
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Expression analysis of candidate breast tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 16q.

Authors:  Tom van Wezel; Marcel Lombaerts; Eddy H van Roon; Katja Philippo; Hans J Baelde; Karoly Szuhai; Cees J Cornelisse; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 6.466

6.  Karyotypic evolutions of cancer species in rats during the long latent periods after injection of nitrosourea.

Authors:  Mathew Bloomfield; Amanda McCormack; Daniele Mandrioli; Christian Fiala; C Marcelo Aldaz; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Speciation Theory of Carcinogenesis Explains Karyotypic Individuality and Long Latencies of Cancers.

Authors:  Ankit Hirpara; Mathew Bloomfield; Peter Duesberg
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Cancer karyotypes: survival of the fittest.

Authors:  Joshua M Nicholson; Daniela Cimini
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Expanded Chinese hamster organ and cell line proteomics profiling reveals tissue-specific functionalities.

Authors:  Kelley Heffner; Deniz Baycin Hizal; Natalia I Majewska; Swetha Kumar; Venkata Gayatri Dhara; Jie Zhu; Michael Bowen; Diane Hatton; George Yerganian; Athena Yerganian; Robert O'Meally; Robert Cole; Michael Betenbaugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.