Literature DB >> 11997423

Surgical and transcatheter (Amplatzer) closure of atrial septal defects: a prospective comparison of results and cost.

J D R Thomson1, E H Aburawi, K G Watterson, C Van Doorn, J L Gibbs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness, complications, and cost of Amplatzer with surgical atrial septal defect (ASD) closure.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary cardiac referral centre. PATIENTS: 43 consecutive patients (excluding non-UK residents) aged between 2.1 and 56.8 years (median 7) undergoing ASD closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Procedural success, complications, regression of right ventricular dilatation (up to one year postprocedure), cost, inpatient stay, and home convalescent time.
RESULTS: Amplatzer ASD closure was successful in 24 of 27 (89%) patients. Surgical closure was successful in all 19 cases. Cardiac complications affecting management occurred in three (11%) of the Amplatzer group (two procedural failures, one device embolisation) and 4 of 19 (21%) surgical patients (one pericardial pain, one global pericardial effusion requiring drainage, and one patient with anaemia requiring haematinics in addition to an incidental pericardial effusion and one further incidental pericardial effusion) (p = NS). There were complications that did not affect management in a further 5 of 19 surgical patients. There was no significant difference in regression of right ventricular dilatation by six months postprocedure (median right ventricular end diastolic diameter decrease: Amplatzer group 17.5%, surgical group 15.1%; median cardiothoracic ratio decrease: Amplatzer 7.9%, surgical 7.5%). Both hospital stay and home convalescent times were significantly shorter after Amplatzer closure (median hospital stay: Amplatzer one day, surgery six days; median convalescent time: Amplatzer two weeks, surgery 5.5 weeks). Median cost was similar for both groups (Amplatzer pound5375, surgical pound5412).
CONCLUSIONS: Amplatzer ASD closure has a lower chance of success with a single procedure than surgery. Overall, there were more complications in the surgical group but the majority of these were minor and did not require any change in management. Resolution of right ventricular dilatation over the study period was similar for both techniques. Time spent in hospital and away from work or school was shorter for the Amplatzer group. The cost of both techniques was similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11997423      PMCID: PMC1767102          DOI: 10.1136/heart.87.5.466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  20 in total

1.  Transvenous atrial septal defect occlusion by the buttoned device.

Authors:  E B Sideris; S E Sideris; B D Thanopoulos; R L Ehly; J P Fowlkes
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Cardiac surgery in the Federal Republic of Germany during 1990. A report by the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

Authors:  P Kalmar; E Irrgang
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect and interatrial communications with a new self expanding nitinol double disc device (Amplatzer septal occluder): multicentre UK experience.

Authors:  K C Chan; M J Godman; K Walsh; N Wilson; A Redington; J L Gibbs
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Comparison of cost and clinical outcome between transcatheter coil occlusion and surgical closure of isolated patent ductus arteriosus.

Authors:  L R Prieto; D M DeCamillo; D J Konrad; L Scalet-Longworth; L A Latson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Comparison of results and complications of surgical and Amplatzer device closure of atrial septal defects.

Authors:  F Berger; M Vogel; V Alexi-Meskishvili; P E Lange
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects with the atrial septal defect occlusion system (ASDOS): initial experience in children.

Authors:  G Hausdorf; M Schneider; B Franzbach; C Kampmann; K Kargus; B Goeldner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Intermediate-term outcome of transcatheter secundum atrial septal defect closure using the Bard Clamshell Septal Umbrella.

Authors:  L R Prieto; C K Foreman; J P Cheatham; L A Latson
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Surgical treatment of adult atrial septal defect: early and long-term results.

Authors:  K A Horvath; R P Burke; J J Collins; L H Cohn
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Echocardiographic predictors of success of catheter closure of atrial septal defect with the buttoned device.

Authors:  S C Reddy; P S Rao; J Ewenko; R Koscik; A D Wilson
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Peri-operative complications following surgical closure of atrial septal defect type II in 232 patients--a baseline study.

Authors:  M O Galal; A Wobst; Z Halees; L Hatle; A A Schmaltz; F Khougeer; E De Vol; M E Fawzy; F Abbag; F Fadley
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  27 in total

1.  Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects improves right ventricular volume, mass, function, pulmonary pressure, and functional class: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  S P Schoen; T Kittner; S Bohl; M U Braun; G Simonis; A Schmeisser; R H Strasser
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-11-11       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Effects of age on hemodynamic changes after transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect: importance of ventricular diastolic function.

Authors:  Satoshi Masutani; Mio Taketazu; Hirotaka Ishido; Yoichi Iwamoto; Shigeki Yoshiba; Tamotsu Matsunaga; Toshiki Kobayashi; Hideaki Senzaki
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Nonparametric inference for median costs with censored data.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhao; Chen Zuo; Shuai Chen; Heejung Bang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  The causes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  P Young; U Suter
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Cribriform amplatzer device closure of fenestrated atrial septal defects: feasibility and technical aspects.

Authors:  Mohammed Numan; Amal El Sisi; Magdi Tofeig; Salwa Gendi; Tohami Tohami; Howaida G El-Said
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Long-term outcome after surgical closure of atrial septal defect in childhood with extensive assessment including MRI measurement of the ventricles.

Authors:  D Bolz; T Lacina; P Buser; M Buser; J Guenthard
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  Atrial septal defect: spectrum of care.

Authors:  R Kharouf; D M Luxenberg; O Khalid; R Abdulla
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  Helex septal occluder: feasibility study of closure of atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Amal Mahmoud El-Sisi; Salwa Gendi; Mohammed Dilawar; Mohamed Numan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 1.655

9.  Closure of defects of the atrial septum in adults using the Amplatzer device: 100 consecutive patients in a single center.

Authors:  I F Purcell; S J Brecker; D E Ward
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 10.  Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Hideto Shimpo; Reina Hojo; Maeshiro Ryo; Takeshi Konuma; Hironori Tempaku
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.