Literature DB >> 11996130

The comparison of rapid bioassays for the assessment of urban groundwater quality.

R E Dewhurst1, J R Wheeler, K S Chummun, J D Mather, A Callaghan, M Crane.   

Abstract

Groundwater is a complex mixture of chemicals that is naturally variable. Current legislation in the UK requires that groundwater quality and the degree of contamination are assessed using chemical methods. Such methods do not consider the synergistic or antagonistic interactions that may affect the bioavailability and toxicity of pollutants in the environment. Bioassays are a method for assessing the toxic impact of whole groundwater samples on the environment. Three rapid bioassays, Eclox, Microtox and ToxAlert, and a Daphnia magna 48-h immobilisation test were used to assess groundwater quality from sites with a wide range of historical uses. Eclox responses indicated that the test was very sensitive to changes in groundwater chemistry; 77% of the results had a percentage inhibition greater than 90%. ToxAlert, although suitable for monitoring changes in water quality under laboratory conditions, produced highly variable results due to fluctuations in temperature and the chemical composition of the samples. Microtox produced replicable results that correlated with those from D. magna tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11996130     DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(02)00060-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  6 in total

1.  Removal of antineoplastic drugs cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and 5-fluorouracil and a vasodilator drug pentoxifylline from wastewaters by ozonation.

Authors:  Angela Yu-Chen Lin; Julia Han-Fang Hsueh; P K Andy Hong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Development of a fully automated Flow Injection analyzer implementing bioluminescent biosensors for water toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Efstratios Komaitis; Efstathios Vasiliou; Gerasimos Kremmydas; Dimitrios G Georgakopoulos; Constantinos Georgiou
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 3.  Water Quality Monitoring in Developing Countries; Can Microbial Fuel Cells be the Answer?

Authors:  Jon Chouler; Mirella Di Lorenzo
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-16

Review 4.  Translating New Synthetic Biology Advances for Biosensing Into the Earth and Environmental Sciences.

Authors:  Ilenne Del Valle; Emily M Fulk; Prashant Kalvapalle; Jonathan J Silberg; Caroline A Masiello; Lauren B Stadler
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Comparison of Joint Effect of Acute and Chronic Toxicity for Combined Assessment of Heavy Metals on Photobacterium sp.NAA-MIE.

Authors:  Nur Adila Adnan; Mohd Izuan Effendi Halmi; Siti Salwa Abd Gani; Uswatun Hasanah Zaidan; Mohd Yunus Abd Shukor
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Comparison of Microtox and Xenoassay light as a near real time river monitoring assay for heavy metals.

Authors:  M I E Halmi; Hussain Jirangon; W L W Johari; A R Abdul Rachman; M Y Shukor; M A Syed
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.