Literature DB >> 11994836

Sensitivity to the rewarding effects of food and exercise in the eating disorders.

Caroline Davis1, D Blake Woodside.   

Abstract

The diminished capacity to experience pleasure or reward ("anhedonia") has its biological underpinnings in the mesolimbic dopamine system and is strongly implicated in risk for a variety of addictive behaviors. The present study tested the prediction that patients with anorexia nervosa (AN) would be more anhedonic than those with bulimia nervosa (BN)-a factor that could contribute to their respective avoidance and approach relationship to food. We also tested the idea that anhedonia would be correlated with high-level exercising from the viewpoint that the latter serves as a compensatory behavior for a blunted affect. AN patients of the restrictor subtype (n = 78) and BN patients with no history of AN (n = 76) were included in the regression analyses. Patients were also classified as excessive exercisers or moderate/nonexercisers according to information gathered during a structured clinical interview. Findings were largely supportive of our predictions. AN patients were highly anhedonic compared to BN patients, and excessive exercisers tended to be more anhedonic than those who did not exercise. We discuss the AN-BN differences in capacity for reward/pleasure in the context of the common psychobiological links between the eating disorders and drug and alcohol addiction, and speculate on how these differences might relate to the etiology and pathophysiology of both AN and BN. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11994836     DOI: 10.1053/comp.2002.32356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Compr Psychiatry        ISSN: 0010-440X            Impact factor:   3.735


  48 in total

1.  Dopamine-related deficit in reward learning after catecholamine depletion in unmedicated, remitted subjects with bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Simona Grob; Diego A Pizzagalli; Sunny J Dutra; Jair Stern; Hanspeter Mörgeli; Gabriella Milos; Ulrich Schnyder; Gregor Hasler
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

3.  Similarities and differences between excessive exercising anorexia nervosa patients compared with DSM-IV defined anorexia nervosa subtypes.

Authors:  K Kiezebrink; D Campbell; E Mann; J Blundell
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 4.  Reward Learning Through the Lens of RDoC: a Review of Theory, Assessment, and Empirical Findings in the Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Lauren M Schaefer; Joanna E Steinglass
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 5.  Cognitive Neuroscience of Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Joanna E Steinglass; Laura A Berner; Evelyn Attia
Journal:  Psychiatr Clin North Am       Date:  2018-12-03

Review 6.  Affect, reward, and punishment in anorexia nervosa: a narrative overview.

Authors:  Margarita Sala; Amy H Egbert; Jason M Lavender; Andrea B Goldschmidt
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 7.  Functional disturbances within frontostriatal circuits across multiple childhood psychopathologies.

Authors:  Rachel Marsh; Tiago V Maia; Bradley S Peterson
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 8.  Does the difference between physically active and couch potato lie in the dopamine system?

Authors:  Amy M Knab; J Timothy Lightfoot
Journal:  Int J Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 6.580

9.  Sugar overconsumption during adolescence selectively alters motivation and reward function in adult rats.

Authors:  Leandro F Vendruscolo; Aliou B Gueye; Muriel Darnaudéry; Serge H Ahmed; Martine Cador
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  SLC6A3 and body mass index in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Azzato; Lindsay M Morton; Andrew W Bergen; Sophia S Wang; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Paul Kvale; Meredith Yeager; Richard B Hayes; Stephen J Chanock; Neil E Caporaso
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.