Literature DB >> 11994593

Perforator topography of the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in 100 cases of breast reconstruction.

Marc Vandevoort1, Jan J Vranckx, Gerd Fabre.   

Abstract

The anatomic topography of the perforators within the rectus muscle and the anterior fascia largely determines the time needed to harvest the perforator free flap and the difficulty of the procedure. In 100 consecutive cases, the topographic patterns of the perforators were investigated. In 65 percent, a short intramuscular course was seen. In 16 percent, a perforator at the tendinous intersection was encountered. In 9 percent, the largest perforator was found to have a long intramuscular course. In 5 percent, a subfascial course was found, and in another 5 percent, a paramedian course was found. In 74 percent of flaps, just one perforator was used, whereas two perforators were dissected in 20 percent. Only in 6 percent of flaps were three perforators used. A long intramuscular course (>4 cm) lengthens the dissection substantially, especially when the intramuscular course is in a step-wise pattern. The subfascial course requires precarious attention at the early stage of the perforator dissection when splitting the fascia. The perforators at the tendinous intersections are the most accessible and require a short but intense dissection in the fibrotic tissue of intersection. A paramedian perforator, medial to the rectus muscle, is a septocutaneous rather than a musculocutaneous perforator. The straightforward dissection almost extends up to the midline. Therefore, dissection always is performed at one side and, if no good perforators are present, continued at the intact contralateral side. The size of these perforators and their location in the flap determine the choice. One perforator with significant flow can perfuse the whole flap. If in doubt, two perforators can be harvested, especially if they show a linear anatomy so that muscle fibers can be split. The only interference with the muscle exists in splitting the muscle fibers. A perforator that lies in the middle of the flap is preferable. For a large flap, a perforator of the medial row provides better perfusion to zone 4 than one of the lateral row because of the extra choke vessel for the lateral row perforators. The clinical appearance of the perforators is the key element in the dissection of the perforator flap. Perforator topography determines the overall length and difficulty of the procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11994593     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200205000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative imaging in the planning of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap surgery.

Authors:  Sébastien Aubry; Julien Pauchot; Adrian Kastler; Olivia Laurent; Yves Tropet; Michel Runge
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Breast reconstruction in private practice.

Authors:  Steven M Pisano; Peter R Ledoux; Chet L Nastala
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  The virtual reality tool VirSSPA in planning DIEP microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Authors:  T Gómez-Cía; P Gacto-Sánchez; D Sicilia; C Suárez; B Acha; C Serrano; C Parra; J De La Higuera
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-05-01       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Concordance between preoperative computed tomography angiographic mapping and intraoperative perforator selection for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions.

Authors:  Vivian B Boer; Jan J van Wingerden; Carolien F Wever; Joost J Kardux; Michiel R Beets; Hester J van der Zaag-Loonen; Willem J Theuvenet
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-12

5.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Strategies for selecting perforator vessels for transverse and oblique DIEP flap in male pediatric patients: Anatomical study and clinical applications.

Authors:  Jiqiang He; Huairui Cui; Liming Qing; Panfeng Wu; Gunel Guliyeva; Fang Yu; Maolin Tang; Juyu Tang
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 3.569

7.  Evaluation of dynamic infrared thermography as an alternative to CT angiography for perforator mapping in breast reconstruction: a clinical study.

Authors:  Sven Weum; James B Mercer; Louis de Weerd
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.930

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.