Literature DB >> 11992804

Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH are complementary in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux.

Brant K Oelschlager1, Thomas R Eubanks, Nicole Maronian, Allen Hillel, Dmitry Oleynikov, Charles E Pope, Carlos A Pellegrini.   

Abstract

Pharyngeal pH monitoring and laryngoscopy are routinely used to diagnose gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux as a cause of respiratory symptoms. Although their use seems intuitive, their ultimate diagnostic value is yet to be defined. We studied 10 asymptomatic (control) subjects and 76 patients with respiratory symptoms. Both patients and control subjects were given a symptom questionnaire. Each underwent direct laryngoscopy using the reflux finding score (RFS) to grade laryngeal injury, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour esophagopharyngeal pH monitoring. The patients were then classified as RFS+, if the score was greater than 7, and pharyngeal reflux (PR)+, if they had more than one episode of PR detected during pH monitoring. The most common symptoms reported by patients were hoarseness (87%), cough (53%), and heartburn (50%). Control subjects had a significantly lower RFS (2.1 vs. 9.6, P < 0.01) and fewer episodes of PR (0.2 vs. 3.4, P < 0.01), than patients. None of the control subjects had more than one episode of PR during a 24-hour period. Fifty patients (66%) were RFS+ and 26 (34%) were RFS-. Thirty-two patients (42%) were PR+ and 44 (58%) were PR-. Fifteen patients had a normal RFS and no PR (group I = RFS-/PR-). Forty patients had discordance between the laryngoscopic findings and the pH monitoring (group II = RFS-/PR+ or RFS+/PR-). Twenty-one patients had both an abnormal RFS and PR (group III = RFS+/PR+). Patients in group III had significantly higher heartburn scores and distal esophageal acid exposure. Eighty-three percent of patients in group III but only 44% in group I improved their respiratory symptoms as a result of antireflux therapy. An abnormal PR or RFS differentiates patients with laryngeal symptoms from control subjects. Agreement between PR and RFS helps establish or refute the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux as a cause of laryngeal symptoms. Patients who are RFS+ and PR- may have laryngeal injury from another source, whereas patients who are RFS- and PR+ may not have acid entering the larynx, despite the presence of PR. Patients who are RFS+ and PR+ have more severe gastroesophageal reflux disease and their reflux causes laryngeal damage. Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH monitoring should be considered complementary studies in establishing the diagnosis of laryngeal injury induced by gastroesophageal reflux. ( J GASTROINTEST SURG 2002;6:189-194.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992804     DOI: 10.1016/s1091-255x(01)00070-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  11 in total

1.  Pharyngeal pH measurements in patients with respiratory symptoms before and during proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Authors:  T R Eubanks; P Omelanczuk; A Hillel; N Maronian; C E Pope; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 2.565

2.  Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter.

Authors:  C F Smit; J Tan; P P Devriese; L M Mathus-Vliegen; M Brandsen; P F Schouwenburg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 3.  Laryngopharyngeal reflux: a modern day "great masquerader".

Authors:  B L Hawkins
Journal:  J Ky Med Assoc       Date:  1997-09

4.  Esophageal manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring in the diagnosis of pulmonary aspiration secondary to gastroesophageal reflux.

Authors:  M G Patti; H T Debas; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).

Authors:  P C Belafsky; G N Postma; J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux.

Authors:  T R Eubanks; P E Omelanczuk; N Maronian; A Hillel; C E Pope; C A Pellegrini
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Simultaneous tracheal and oesophageal pH measurements in asthmatic patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux.

Authors:  C I Jack; P M Calverley; R J Donnelly; J Tran; G Russell; C R Hind; C C Evans
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  Gastroesophageal reflux. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and therapy.

Authors:  J E Richter; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Observations on the pathogenesis of chronic non-specific pharyngitis and laryngitis.

Authors:  P H Ward; G Berci
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 10.  The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.

Authors:  J A Koufman
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  The laryngeal and esophageal manifestations of Sjögren's syndrome.

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Gregory N Postma
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 2.  Evaluation of patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux: a practical approach.

Authors:  Anas Abou-Ismail; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2011-06

3.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related airway disorder.

Authors:  J A Kaufman; J E Houghland; E Quiroga; M Cahill; C A Pellegrini; B K Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Related to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: A Systematic Review of Instrument Development and Validation.

Authors:  David O Francis; Dhyanesh A Patel; Rohit Sharda; Kristen Hovis; Nila Sathe; David F Penson; Irene D Feurer; Melissa L McPheeters; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Reflux and Voice Disorders: Have We Established Causality?

Authors:  G Todd Schneider; Michael F Vaezi; David O Francis
Journal:  Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep       Date:  2016-07-09

7.  Pepsin detection in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux before and after fundoplication.

Authors:  Eelco Wassenaar; Nikki Johnston; Albert Merati; Martin Montenovo; Rebecca Petersen; Roger Tatum; Carlos Pellegrini; Brant Oelschlager
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring for the evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic (ENT) manifestations of GERD. A multicenter study.

Authors:  Fernando A M Herbella; Ciro Andolfi; Yalini Vigneswaran; Marco G Patti; Bruno R Pinna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Long-term patient outcomes after laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures.

Authors:  Anton Simorov; Ajay Ranade; Rachel Jones; Carl Tadaki; Valerie Shostrom; Eugene Boilesen; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Ambulatory 24-hour pharyngeal pH monitoring in healthy Korean volunteers.

Authors:  Won Moon; Moo In Park; Seun Ja Park; Kyu Jong Kim; Kang Dae Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.