Literature DB >> 11992339

Early identification of patients with an acute coronary syndrome as assessed by dispatchers and the ambulance crew.

Johan Herlitz1, Mia Starke, Elisabeth Hansson, Eva Ringvall, Björn W Karlson, Lisbeth Waagstein.   

Abstract

This study was performed to evaluate the possibility of early identification of patients with an acute coronary syndrome who are transported by ambulance. All patients in the community of Göteborg who were transported by ambulance over a period of 3 months owing to symptoms raising any suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome were studied. In all 930 cases that were included in the survey, 130 (14%) had a final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and 276 (30%) had a final diagnosis of an acute coronary syndrome. Independent risk indicators for development of AMI were: male sex (odds ratio 1.70; 95% confidence limits 1.02-2.84), cold and clammy on admission of the ambulance crew (odds ratio 2.07; 95% confidence limits 1.23-3.49) and showing electrocardiogram (ECG) signs of myocardial ischemia on admission to the emergency department (odds ratio 8.78; 95%confidence limits 5.28-14.61). Independent predictors for development of an acute coronary syndrome were: male sex (odds ratio 1.97; 95% confidence limits 1.30-2.99), a history of angina pectoris (odds ratio 3.41; 95% confidence limits 2.24-5.26), cold and clammy on admission of the ambulance crew (odds ratio 1.95; 95% confidence limits 1.21-3.15), and ECG signs of myocardial ischemia on admission to the emergency department (odds ratio 5.55; 95% confidence limits 3.63-8.58). Among patients seen by the ambulance crew with symptoms raising any suspicion of an acute coronary syndrome, predictors for that diagnosis included male sex, a history of angina pectoris, patients being cold and clammy on admission of the ambulance crew, and ECG signs of myocardial ischemia on admission to the emergency department. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11992339     DOI: 10.1053/ajem.2002.33003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  4 in total

1.  Does a Code for Acute Myocardial Infarction Mean the Same in All Norwegian Hospitals? A Likelihood Approach to a Medical Record Review.

Authors:  Jon Helgeland; Doris Tove Kristoffersen; Katrine Damgaard Skyrud
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 5.814

2.  Accuracy of emergency medical services (EMS) telephone triage in identifying acute coronary syndrome (ACS) for patients with chest pain: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Ahmed Alotaibi; Abdulrhman Alghamdi; Charles Reynard; Richard Body
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 3.  Signs and symptoms in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome: a diagnostic meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rudi Bruyninckx; Bert Aertgeerts; Pieter Bruyninckx; Frank Buntinx
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Sensitivity, specificity, and sex differences in symptoms reported on the 13-item acute coronary syndrome checklist.

Authors:  Holli A Devon; Anne Rosenfeld; Alana D Steffen; Mohamud Daya
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 5.501

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.