Literature DB >> 11991767

Human muscle power output during upper- and lower-body exercises.

Judith A Siegel1, Roger M Gilders, Robert S Staron, Frederick C Hagerman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of traditional resistance training equipment in the measurement of muscular power. This was accomplished by measuring the velocity of movement through a measured distance during maximal effort lifts using a Smith rack. The reliability of the method was established using 10 male volunteers who performed both bench press and squat exercises in a Smith rack. Maximal power output was determined at 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90% of the subject's 1 repetition maximum (1RM). Test-retest power values were not statistically different. Another 15 male volunteers who had previous muscle biopsy data from the vastus lateralis muscle performed the same maximal power output evaluation. There were no significant relationships between peak power outputs and fiber-type expressions when linear regressions were performed. The power curve produced by graphing power output vs. the percentage of 1RM indicates that peak power output occurs between 50 and 70% of 1RM for the squat and between 40 and 60% of 1RM for the bench press. These data indicate that this method of evaluation of muscle power is reliable, although it is not predictive of muscle fiber-type percentages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11991767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  14 in total

Review 1.  A biomechanical evaluation of resistance: fundamental concepts for training and sports performance.

Authors:  David M Frost; John Cronin; Robert U Newton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Challenges in understanding the influence of maximal power training on improving athletic performance.

Authors:  John Cronin; Gord Sleivert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses.

Authors:  Blair Crewther; John Cronin; Justin Keogh
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  A comparison of the kinematics, kinetics and muscle activity between pneumatic and free weight resistance.

Authors:  David Michael Frost; John Barry Cronin; Robert Usher Newton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Optimum loading for maximizing muscle power output: the effect of training history.

Authors:  Nemanja Pazin; Predrag Bozic; Berjan Bobana; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  A brief review of strength and ballistic assessment methodologies in sport.

Authors:  Daniel Travis McMaster; Nicholas Gill; John Cronin; Michael McGuigan
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Early-phase muscular adaptations in response to slow-speed versus traditional resistance-training regimens.

Authors:  Mark D Schuenke; Jennifer R Herman; Roger M Gliders; Fredrick C Hagerman; Robert S Hikida; Sharon R Rana; Kerry E Ragg; Robert S Staron
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Effect of traditional resistance and power training using rated perceived exertion for enhancement of muscle strength, power, and functional performance.

Authors:  Carlos Leandro Tiggemann; Caroline Pieta Dias; Regis Radaelli; Jéssica Cassales Massa; Rafael Bortoluzzi; Maira Cristina Wolf Schoenell; Matias Noll; Cristine Lima Alberton; Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-03-23

9.  Optimizing muscle power after stroke: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Verna A Stavric; Peter J McNair
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Strength Training Intensity and Volume Affect Performance of Young Kayakers/Canoeists.

Authors:  Martijn Gäbler; Hermine S Berberyan; Olaf Prieske; Marije T Elferink-Gemser; Tibor Hortobágyi; Torsten Warnke; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.