Literature DB >> 11990803

Cranial remodeling to treat craniosynostosis by gradual distraction using a new device.

Keisuke Imai1, Hiroyuki Komune, Chiaya Toda, Takeru Nomachi, Eiji Enoki, Hiroaki Sakamoto, Shohei Kitano, Mitsuo Hatoko, Takuya Fujimoto.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors describe their experience in remodeling the shape of the cranium in children with craniosynostosis by using gradual distraction. In half of the cases, a new distraction device developed by the authors was used.
METHODS: Twenty children with craniosynostosis underwent frontoorbital advancement and cranial remodeling assisted by gradual distraction. There were five children with brachycephaly, two with oxycephaly, five with scaphocephaly, two with plagiocephaly, one with combined scaphocephaly and plagiocephaly, and five with trigonocephaly. Four cases were syndromic and 16 were nonsyndromic. The patients ranged in age from 3 to 50 months (mean 14.5 months) at the first surgery. Simulated surgery was first performed on a three-dimensional solid model made of polyurethane, which accurately represented cranial flexibility, to determine the most favorable osteotomy line. Distraction was initiated 1 week postoperatively. The speed and extent of advancement (maximum extension 45 mm) were predetermined on the basis of previously reported criteria and the results of simulated surgery. Postoperatively, the cranial configuration was favorable in all cases. Spontaneous remodeling of irregularities and/or gaps apparent after distraction was found to occur 2 to 5 months after removal of the distraction devices, especially in patients with trigonocephaly or scaphocephaly. No major perioperative complication was observed in any patient. There were minor complications in six of the first 10 cases, including exposure of the device, shaft slippage, and fluid discharge. A new device was developed and used on the last 10 patients treated; it successfully eliminated device exposure and shaft slippage. A 3-year follow-up review confirmed that there was no relapse of advanced bones.
CONCLUSIONS: Highly satisfactory results were achieved in cases of both syndromic and nonsyndromic craniosynostosis when gradual distraction was performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11990803     DOI: 10.3171/jns.2002.96.4.0654

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  12 in total

1.  Posterior calvarial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Nicholas White; Martin Evans; M Stephen Dover; Peter Noons; Guirish Solanki; Hiroshi Nishikawa
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Hybrid surgery for scaphocephaly with distraction osteogenesis using skull expanders: technical note.

Authors:  Nobuhito Morota; Hideki Ogiwara; Tsuyoshi Kaneko
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 3.  Skull vault growth in craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Spyros Sgouros
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2005-03-25       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  The usage of the three-dimension distractor in the NAVID system for plagiocephaly-three case reports.

Authors:  Hirokatsu Osawa; Mihoko Kato; Masamune Nagakura; Tsuyoshi Morishita; Goro Kondo; Michihiro Kurimoto
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 5.  Short- and Long-Term Outcomes by Procedure Type for Nonsagittal Single-Suture Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Geoffrey E Hespe; Christian J Vercler; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2019 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  A simple technique for the correction of frontal bossing in synostotic scaphocephaly.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wagner; Dorothee Wiewrodt
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Indication for and surgical outcomes of the distraction method in various types of craniosynostosis. Advantages, disadvantages, and current concepts for surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Yuichiro Nonaka; Shizuo Oi; Takeshi Miyawaki; Akihiko Shinoda; Kunihiro Kurihara
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 1.475

8.  Role of intraoral distractors in management of cranial synostosis: An initial experience.

Authors:  Nandakishor Sahoo; Indranil Deb Roy; Vishal Gupta; Ajay Premanand Desai
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-01

Review 9.  Distraction Osteogenesis Update: Introduction of Multidirectional Cranial Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Akira Gomi; Ataru Sunaga; Hideaki Kamochi; Hirofumi Oguma; Yasushi Sugawara
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10

Review 10.  Physiological Changes and Clinical Implications of Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sakamoto; Yasuhiro Matsusaka; Noritsugu Kunihiro; Keisuke Imai
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.