Literature DB >> 11990444

A clinical comparison of a bovine-derived xenograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of periodontal osseous defects in humans.

E Todd Scheyer1, Diega Velasquez-Plata, Michael A Brunsvold, David J Lasho, James T Mellonig.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enamel matrix protein derivative (EMD) and particulate anorganic cancellous bovine-derived bone xenograft (BDX) have both shown favorable clinical results in reducing intrabony periodontal defects as compared to open flap debridement alone. These materials have shown results comparable to those obtained with guided tissue regeneration. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of EMD combined with BDX as compared to BDX alone, with a secondary aim to compare the treatment outcomes of the 2 modalities.
METHODS: Seventeen patients with paired intrabony defects and probing depths measuring > or = 5 mm who were being treated for chronic periodontitis were selected for this controlled, blinded, split-mouth study. Following non-surgical periodontal therapy, sites were randomly selected to receive either a combination of EMD and BDX (test group) or BDX alone (positive control group). Baseline and 6-month surgical reentry measurements were taken by a calibrated examiner blinded to the treatment. A paired Student t test was utilized to evaluate differences between baseline and post-treatment and between the treatment groups.
RESULTS: Favorable clinical outcomes for both hard and soft tissue measurements were achieved for both treatment groups when compared to baseline (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference for any of the measured clinical parameters. Probing depth reduction for the test group and control group was 4.2 +/- 1.1 mm and 3.9 +/- 1.3 mm, respectively (P > 0.8). Mean gain in clinical attachment levels for the test and control groups was 3.8 +/- 0.9 mm and 3.7 +/- 1.5 mm, respectively (P > 0.6). Hard tissue measurements obtained at surgical reentry were used to calculate the bone fill (BF) and percent bone fill (%BF). The BF was 3.2 +/- 1.4 mm and 3.0 +/- 1.2 mm (P > 0.6), and the %BF was 63.3 +/- 16.3% and 67.0 +/- 19.0% (P > 0.4) for the EMD + BDX and BDX groups, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, both the particulate anorganic cancellous bovine-derived bone xenograft used alone and in combination with enamel matrix derivative are effective for the treatment of human intrabony periodontal lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11990444     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2002.73.4.423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  14 in total

1.  Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft and platelet-rich plasma vs platelet-rich plasma alone in infrabony defects: a clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Tunç Ilgenli; Nesrin Dündar; Betül Ilhan Kal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-12-09       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Enamel matrix derivative alone or in combination with a bioactive glass in wide intrabony defects.

Authors:  Bahar Kuru; Selçuk Yilmaz; Kiliçaslan Argin; Ulkü Noyan
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-05-16       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Bone grafting material in combination with Osteogain for bone repair: a rat histomorphometric study.

Authors:  Yufeng Zhang; Dai Jing; Daniel Buser; Anton Sculean; Fatiha Chandad; Richard J Miron
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Enamel matrix derivative and bone grafts for periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Matarasso; V Iorio-Siciliano; A Blasi; L Ramaglia; G E Salvi; A Sculean
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparative study of DFDBA in combination with enamel matrix derivative versus DFDBA alone for treatment of periodontal intrabony defects at 12 months post-surgery.

Authors:  Simone Domenico Aspriello; Luigi Ferrante; Corrado Rubini; Matteo Piemontese
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Injectable biomaterials for regenerating complex craniofacial tissues.

Authors:  James D Kretlow; Simon Young; Leda Klouda; Mark Wong; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Effect of the combination of enamel matrix derivatives and deproteinized bovine bone materials on bone formation in rabbits' calvarial defects.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahriari; Behzad Houshmand; Hamid Razavian; Saber Khazaei; Fatemeh Mashhadi Abbas
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2012-07

8.  The Application of Microencapsulation Techniques in the Treatment of Endodontic and Periodontal Diseases.

Authors:  Asteria Luzardo Alvarez; Francisco Otero Espinar; José Blanco Méndez
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Microscope-controlled glass bead blasting: a new technique.

Authors:  Peter Kotschy; Sascha Virnik; Doris Christ; Alexander Gaggl
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2011-01-20

10.  Dentascan an excellent tool for assessment of variations in the management of periodontal defects.

Authors:  Virendra Kumar; Jaya Dixit; Nand Lal; Umesh Pratap Verma; Puja Debnath; Anjani Kumar Pathak
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017 Jul-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.