Literature DB >> 11990047

Retention of composite resin restorations in class IV preparations.

Hani Eid1.   

Abstract

Clinicians often utilized composite resin restorations in combination with different types of preparation to restore class IV fractures on anterior incisors. A new preparation technique called (stair-step chamfer technique) is investigated in this study to detect bond strength to tooth structure. Eighty-eight bovine teeth were divided into 4 groups. Group I had twenty-three samples with a 45 degree bevel that extended 2 millimeters beyond the fracture line. Group II had twenty-three samples with a circumferential chamfer, which extended 2 mm beyond the fracture line and half the enamel thickness in depth. Group III had twenty-three samples with a facial stair-step chamfer, which followed the anatomical contour and extended 2 mm beyond the fracture line with a lingual plain chamfer. Group IV had eighteen samples as controls, which were untreated teeth. The first three groups were prepared and restored with hybrid composite resin in conjunction with a single step bonding agent and as surface penetrating sealer, then tested for shear-bond strength on the Instron machine. The results were that there was no significant difference found between the treated teeth when tested for shear-bond strength. However, according to the site of the fracture, the stair-step chamfer technique gave significantly better results. It can be concluded that, the stir-step chamfer technique provides the clinician better environment to place a composite resin restoration resulting in good shear-bond strength and better esthetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11990047     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.26.3.g75705380m0w414m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  4 in total

1.  Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of the Load-bearing Capacity of Fractured Incisal Edge of Maxillary Permanent Central Incisors restored with a Glass Fiber-reinforced Nanocomposite: An in vitro Study.

Authors:  Ps Praveen Kumar; K T Srilatha; B Nandlal; Kanika Singh Dhull
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-04-28

3.  Influence of restorative technique, Bevelling and aging on composite bonding to sectioned incisal edges: A comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Pradeep K Poojary; Shreetha Bhandary; Raghu Srinivasan; Farhat Nasreen; J Pramod; Mc Mahesh
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-01

4.  Comparative Evaluation of the Fracture Resistance of Two Different Fiber-reinforced Composite Restorations with Particulate Filler Composite Restorations.

Authors:  Arun K Patnana; Vanga V Narasimha Rao; Srinivas K Chandrabhatla; Vabbala R Rajasekhar
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2018-08-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.