Literature DB >> 11988360

Reproductive and developmental effects of endocrine disrupters in invertebrates: in vitro and in vivo approaches.

Thomas H Hutchinson1.   

Abstract

In order to gain basic understanding in the ecotoxicity of endocrine disrupting chemicals or EDCs (including natural chemicals and some pharmaceuticals), many international research groups are currently testing these chemicals using aquatic invertebrates. This paper discusses relevant examples to address key questions: which aquatic invertebrates are likely to be vulnerable to mammalian and non-mammalian EDCs; and which types of invertebrate chronic tests might be most sensitive and cost-effective to address potential environmental exposures? For a full review of invertebrate endocrine disrupter research see Endocrine Disruption in Invertebrates: Endocrinology, Testing and Assessment (1999). As an example, crustaceans are a particular focus of EDC research, reflecting their abundance in nature, commercial importance and their inclusion in the regulatory assessment schemes for active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs). There is a diverse literature on the developmental and reproductive effects of mammalian EDCs in Crustacea, although there is growing evidence that such effects are probably not mediated via arthropod hormone systems. For example, recent studies in Europe using a marine copepod (Tisbe battagliai) life-cycle test have evaluated ecdysteroid agonists (e.g. 20-hydroxyecdysone), oestrogen agonists (e.g. diethylstilbestrol (DES), 17beta-oestradiol, oestrone and 17alpha-ethynylestradiol) and the pharmaceutical anti-oestrogen (ZM189, 154). While 20-hydroxyecdysone and DES were highly toxic, the other compounds tested show no significant toxicity to copepods. Furthermore, in vitro studies indicate that these environmental EDCs and several related APIs are not active against the ecdysteroid receptor. Therefore, other undefined modes of action appear to be responsible for crustacean toxicity in vivo and caution should be exercised before ascribing any apical effects to endogenous endocrine mechanisms, or before crustacean "EDC" data are extrapolated to other invertebrate taxa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11988360     DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4274(02)00046-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  12 in total

Review 1.  Experimental designs to assess endocrine disrupting effects in invertebrates. A review.

Authors:  Carlos Barata; Cinta Porte; Donald J Baird
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Developing Test Guidelines on invertebrate development and reproduction for the assessment of chemicals, including potential endocrine active substances- the OECD perspective.

Authors:  Anne Gourmelon; Jukka Ahtiainen
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Small is useful in endocrine disrupter assessment--four key recommendations for aquatic invertebrate research.

Authors:  Thomas H Hutchinson
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 4.  Steroids in aquatic invertebrates.

Authors:  René Lafont; Michel Mathieu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Developmental and reproductive effects of tamoxifen on Daphnia magna.

Authors:  Mina Jo; Sangwoo Lee; Seokjoo Yoon; Woo-Keun Kim
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Diverse animal models to examine potential role(s) and mechanism of endocrine disrupting chemicals on the tumor progression and prevention: Do they have tumorigenic or anti-tumorigenic property?

Authors:  Min-Ah Park; Kyung-A Hwang; Kyung-Chul Choi
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2011-12-19

7.  Nosema ceranae, Fipronil and their combination compromise honey bee reproduction via changes in male physiology.

Authors:  Guillaume Kairo; David G Biron; Faten Ben Abdelkader; Marc Bonnet; Sylvie Tchamitchian; Marianne Cousin; Claudia Dussaubat; Boris Benoit; André Kretzschmar; Luc P Belzunces; Jean-Luc Brunet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Bisphenol A affects the pulse rate of Lumbriculus variegatus via an estrogenic mechanism.

Authors:  Yuyang Wang; Hong-Sheng Wang
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.520

9.  Outlining eicosanoid biosynthesis in the crustacean Daphnia.

Authors:  Lars-Henrik Heckmann; Richard M Sibly; Martijn Jtn Timmermans; Amanda Callaghan
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 3.172

10.  The multigenerational effects of water contamination and endocrine disrupting chemicals on the fitness of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Suany Quesada-Calderón; Leonardo Daniel Bacigalupe; Andrés Fernando Toro-Vélez; Carlos Arturo Madera-Parra; Miguel Ricardo Peña-Varón; Heiber Cárdenas-Henao
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.