V Speirs1, G P Skliris, S E Burdall, P J Carder. 1. Molecular Medicine Unit, University of Leeds, St James's University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK. v.speirs@leeda.ac.uk
Abstract
AIM: Two oestrogen receptors (ERs) have been identified to date-the "classic" ER alpha and the more recently described ER beta. Although much is known about ER alpha at the mRNA and protein levels, our knowledge of the expression and distribution of ER beta protein is much more limited. The aim of this study was to compare the cellular distribution of ER alpha and ER beta in normal human mammary gland. METHODS: Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded material was obtained from reduction mammoplasty specimens, normal tissue adjacent to breast tumour, or fibroadenoma. Sections were immunohistochemically stained for ER alpha, ER beta, and the progesterone receptor. The staining pattern for each antibody was evaluated and compared. RESULTS: ER alpha was restricted to the cell nuclei of epithelial cells lining ducts and lobules. Although ER beta was also seen in these cells, additional strong staining was detected specifically in the cell nuclei of myoepithelial cells. Occasional staining was seen in surrounding stromal and endothelial cell nuclei and in lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: ER subtypes have distinct distribution patterns in the normal mammary gland. The widespread distribution of ER beta suggests that it may be the dominant ER in the mammary gland where it may be acting as a natural suppressor.
AIM: Two oestrogen receptors (ERs) have been identified to date-the "classic" ER alpha and the more recently described ER beta. Although much is known about ER alpha at the mRNA and protein levels, our knowledge of the expression and distribution of ER beta protein is much more limited. The aim of this study was to compare the cellular distribution of ER alpha and ER beta in normal human mammary gland. METHODS:Formalin fixed, paraffin wax embedded material was obtained from reduction mammoplasty specimens, normal tissue adjacent to breast tumour, or fibroadenoma. Sections were immunohistochemically stained for ER alpha, ER beta, and the progesterone receptor. The staining pattern for each antibody was evaluated and compared. RESULTS:ER alpha was restricted to the cell nuclei of epithelial cells lining ducts and lobules. Although ER beta was also seen in these cells, additional strong staining was detected specifically in the cell nuclei of myoepithelial cells. Occasional staining was seen in surrounding stromal and endothelial cell nuclei and in lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: ER subtypes have distinct distribution patterns in the normal mammary gland. The widespread distribution of ER beta suggests that it may be the dominant ER in the mammary gland where it may be acting as a natural suppressor.
Authors: B S Shoker; C Jarvis; R B Clarke; E Anderson; J Hewlett; M P Davies; D R Sibson; J P Sloane Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1999-12 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: J H Krege; J B Hodgin; J F Couse; E Enmark; M Warner; J F Mahler; M Sar; K S Korach; J A Gustafsson; O Smithies Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1998-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: H O Critchley; R M Brenner; T A Henderson; K Williams; N R Nayak; O D Slayden; M R Millar; P T Saunders Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Tina J Hieken; Jodi M Carter; John R Hawse; Tanya L Hoskin; Melanie Bois; Marlene Frost; Lynn C Hartmann; Derek C Radisky; Daniel W Visscher; Amy C Degnim Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2015-08-14
Authors: Hakeemah Al-Nakhle; Philip A Burns; Michele Cummings; Andrew M Hanby; Thomas A Hughes; Sampoorna Satheesha; Abeer M Shaaban; Laura Smith; Valerie Speirs Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: L Nakopoulou; A C Lazaris; E G Panayotopoulou; I Giannopoulou; N Givalos; S Markaki; A Keramopoulos Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 3.411