OBJECTIVE: Disruptions in connectivity between the frontal and temporal lobes may explain some of the symptoms observed in schizophrenia. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, however, have not shown compelling evidence for white matter abnormalities, because white matter fiber tracts cannot be visualized by conventional MRI. Diffusion tensor imaging is a relatively new technique that can detect subtle white matter abnormalities in vivo by assessing the degree to which directionally organized fibers have lost their normal integrity. The first three diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia showed lower anisotropic diffusion, relative to comparison subjects, in whole-brain white matter, prefrontal and temporal white matter, and the corpus callosum, respectively. Here the authors focus on fiber tracts forming temporal-frontal connections. METHOD: Anisotropic diffusion was assessed in the uncinate fasciculus, the most prominent white matter tract connecting temporal and frontal brain regions, in 15 patients with chronic schizophrenia and 18 normal comparison subjects. A 1.5-T GE Echospeed system was used to acquire 4-mm-thick coronal line-scan diffusion tensor images. Maps of the fractional anisotropy were generated to quantify the water diffusion within the uncinate fasciculus. RESULTS: Findings revealed a group-by-side interaction for fractional anisotropy and for uncinate fasciculus area, derived from automatic segmentation. The patients with schizophrenia showed a lack of normal left-greater-than-right asymmetry seen in the comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the importance of investigating white matter tracts in vivo in schizophrenia and support the hypothesis of a disruption in the normal pattern of connectivity between temporal and frontal brain regions in schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE: Disruptions in connectivity between the frontal and temporal lobes may explain some of the symptoms observed in schizophrenia. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, however, have not shown compelling evidence for white matter abnormalities, because white matter fiber tracts cannot be visualized by conventional MRI. Diffusion tensor imaging is a relatively new technique that can detect subtle white matter abnormalities in vivo by assessing the degree to which directionally organized fibers have lost their normal integrity. The first three diffusion tensor imaging studies in schizophrenia showed lower anisotropic diffusion, relative to comparison subjects, in whole-brain white matter, prefrontal and temporal white matter, and the corpus callosum, respectively. Here the authors focus on fiber tracts forming temporal-frontal connections. METHOD: Anisotropic diffusion was assessed in the uncinate fasciculus, the most prominent white matter tract connecting temporal and frontal brain regions, in 15 patients with chronic schizophrenia and 18 normal comparison subjects. A 1.5-T GE Echospeed system was used to acquire 4-mm-thick coronal line-scan diffusion tensor images. Maps of the fractional anisotropy were generated to quantify the water diffusion within the uncinate fasciculus. RESULTS: Findings revealed a group-by-side interaction for fractional anisotropy and for uncinate fasciculus area, derived from automatic segmentation. The patients with schizophrenia showed a lack of normal left-greater-than-right asymmetry seen in the comparison subjects. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate the importance of investigating white matter tracts in vivo in schizophrenia and support the hypothesis of a disruption in the normal pattern of connectivity between temporal and frontal brain regions in schizophrenia.
Authors: J M Goldstein; J M Goodman; L J Seidman; D N Kennedy; N Makris; H Lee; J Tourville; V S Caviness; S V Faraone; M T Tsuang Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1999-06
Authors: F Zelaya; N Flood; J B Chalk; D Wang; D M Doddrell; W Strugnell; M Benson; L Ostergaard; J Semple; S Eagle Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: P W Woodruff; I C Wright; N Shuriquie; H Russouw; T Rushe; R J Howard; M Graves; E T Bullmore; R M Murray Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: M S Buchsbaum; C Y Tang; S Peled; H Gudbjartsson; D Lu; E A Hazlett; J Downhill; M Haznedar; J H Fallon; S W Atlas Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1998-02-16 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: P R Szeszko; R M Bilder; T Lencz; S Pollack; J M Alvir; M Ashtari; H Wu; J A Lieberman Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 1999-02-22 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Stephan E Maier; Hatsuho Mamata; Melissa Frumin; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Harv Rev Psychiatry Date: 2002 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Hae-Jeong Park; Marek Kubicki; Martha E Shenton; Alexandre Guimond; Robert W McCarley; Stephan E Maier; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Carl-Fredrik Westin Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: John H Krystal; D Cyril D'Souza; Daniel Mathalon; Edward Perry; Aysenil Belger; Ralph Hoffman Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-09-02 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Marek Kubicki; Stephan E Maier; Carl-Frederik Westin; Hatsuho Mamata; Hal Ersner-Hershfield; Raul Estepar; Ron Kikinis; Ferenc A Jolesz; Robert W McCarley; Martha E Shenton Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Brittany G Travers; Nagesh Adluru; Chad Ennis; Do P M Tromp; Dan Destiche; Sam Doran; Erin D Bigler; Nicholas Lange; Janet E Lainhart; Andrew L Alexander Journal: Autism Res Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 5.216
Authors: Matthew D Perlstein; Moeed R Chohan; Ioana L Coman; Kevin M Antshel; Wanda P Fremont; Matthew H Gnirke; Zora Kikinis; Frank A Middleton; Petya D Radoeva; Martha E Shenton; Wendy R Kates Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2013-12-08 Impact factor: 4.939