Literature DB >> 11984726

The role of growth patterns, according to Kodama's classification, and lymph node status, as important prognostic factors in early gastric cancer: analysis of 412 cases.

Luca Saragoni1, Michele Gaudio, Paolo Morgagni, Secondo Folli, Antonio Vio, Emanuela Scarpi, Ariele Saragoni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the 1970s, a special type of Gastric Cancer with excellent prognosis (early gastric cancer; EGC) was identified by the Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. EGC has been defined as a tumor which invades the mucosa and/or submucosa, regardless of the lymph node status. Using this definition, we identified an initial phase of tumor development which could be treated both endoscopically and surgically.
METHODS: We examined 412 EGC patients, recruited between 1976 and 1999, with an average follow-up of 9 years. All tumors were classified according to the macroscopic and microscopic criteria proposed by the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Endoscopy (JSGE) and Lauren, respectively. The infiltrative growth pattern was evaluated according to Kodama's classification. Only tumor-related death was considered as an end-point of interest for the survival analysis.
RESULTS: Submucosal tumors ( P = 0.008), Pen A (see definition below) type disease ( P = 0.0001), and lymph node-positive cancers ( P = 0.0002) were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis. Moreover, bivariate analysis showed that the worst prognosis, in terms of survival, was for patients with nodal involvment, submucosal invasion, and node-positive and Pen-A type cancer. The abbreviation Pen, penetrating, indicates a lesion with a diameter of less than 4 cm, which invades the submucosa diffusely. Pen A type EGC represents a subgroup of tumors which infiltrates the submucosa extensively, with nodular masses, causing the complete destruction of the muscularis mucosae.
CONCLUSION: In our series, Pen A type was an important prognostic factor (hazard ratio; HR, 8.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.49-19.86. For this reason, we believe it is important to evaluate the infiltration into the wall in all patients with EGC, paying particular attention to the growth pattern of the neoplasm. Moreover, submucosal Pen A type tumors had a considerably worse prognosis and this finding was reinforced when lymph node metastases coexisted. We suggest, therefore, that surgical treatment with at least a D2 lymphadenectomy is performed in all these patients, as the lesions must be considered to be advanced, no longer being EGC.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11984726     DOI: 10.1007/pl00011707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  8 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic gastrectomy with D2 dissection for adenocarcinoma: initial experience with 17 patients.

Authors:  R Pugliese; D Maggioni; F Sansonna; G C Ferrari; S Di Lernia; C Magistro; I Pauna; A Forgione; A Costanzi; C Brambilla; F Pugliese
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-11-26

2.  Subtotal gastrectomy with D2 dissection by minimally invasive surgery for distal adenocarcinoma of the stomach: results and 5-year survival.

Authors:  Raffaele Pugliese; Dario Maggioni; Fabio Sansonna; Andrea Costanzi; Giovanni Carlo Ferrari; Stefano Di Lernia; Carmelo Magistro; Paolo De Martini; Francesco Pugliese
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-23       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Early gastric cancer: diagnosis, staging, and clinical impact. Evaluation of 530 patients. New elements for an updated definition and classification.

Authors:  Luca Saragoni; Paolo Morgagni; Andrea Gardini; Caterina Marfisi; Giovanni Vittimberga; Domenico Garcea; Emanuela Scarpi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Early Gastric Cancer: Clinical Behavior and Treatment Options. Results of an Italian Multicenter Study on Behalf of the Italian Gastric Cancer Research Group (GIRCG).

Authors:  Luca Saragoni; Emanuela Scarpi; Alessandra Ravaioli; Paolo Morgagni; Franco Roviello; Carla Vindigni; Stefano Rausei; Anna Maria Chiaravalli; Uberto Fumagalli; Paola Spaggiari; Fausto Rosa; Riccardo Ricci; Annibale Donini; Paolo Giovenali; Anna Tomezzoli; Giovanni De Manzoni
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-01-31

5.  Differences in the prognosis of early gastric cancer according to sex and age.

Authors:  Do Dam Suh; Seong Tae Oh; Jeong Hwan Yook; Byung-Sik Kim; Beom Su Kim
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  Nomograms Involving HER2 for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Early Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Yu Mei; Shuo Wang; Tienan Feng; Min Yan; Fei Yuan; Zhenggang Zhu; Tian Li; Zhenglun Zhu
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-12-24

7.  Early Gastric Cancer: identification of molecular markers able to distinguish submucosa-penetrating lesions with different prognosis.

Authors:  Paola Ulivi; Luca Saragoni; Chiara Molinari; Gianluca Tedaldi; Francesca Rebuzzi; Paolo Morgagni; Laura Capelli; Sara Ravaioli; Maria Maddalena Tumedei; Emanuela Scarpi; Anna Tomezzoli; Riccardo Bernasconi; Maria Raffaella Ambrosio; Alessia D'Ignazio; Leonardo Solaini; Francesco Limarzi; Giorgio Ercolani; Giovanni Martinelli
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Upgrading the definition of early gastric cancer: better staging means more appropriate treatment.

Authors:  Luca Saragoni
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.248

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.