BACKGROUND: The rate of HIV transmission is increasing more in women than in any other group. There is an urgent need for the development of microbicides with activity against this virus that women can use during intercourse. These products must be convenient, effective, and safe, and ideally they will cause minimal disruption in the normal vaginal ecosystem. GOAL: The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in vaginal microflora, specifically Lactobacillus species, with the use of BufferGel. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the change in vaginal flora before and after BufferGel use. BufferGel was applied vaginally once or twice daily for 14 days by low-risk abstinent and monogamous women. RESULTS: There was no change in frequency of Lactobacillus species after BufferGel use. However, there was a decrease in H2O2-producing lactobacilli (from 4.9 x 107 to 1.1 x 107 cfu; P = 0.001). The proportion of facultative gram-negative rods present increased from 27% to 65% after BufferGel use, whereas obligately anaerobic microbes decreased from 62% to 38%. CONCLUSION: Use of BufferGel once or twice daily for 14 days resulted in no clinically significant change in Lactobacillus colonization.
BACKGROUND: The rate of HIV transmission is increasing more in women than in any other group. There is an urgent need for the development of microbicides with activity against this virus that women can use during intercourse. These products must be convenient, effective, and safe, and ideally they will cause minimal disruption in the normal vaginal ecosystem. GOAL: The objective of this study was to evaluate changes in vaginal microflora, specifically Lactobacillus species, with the use of BufferGel. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study was performed to evaluate the change in vaginal flora before and after BufferGel use. BufferGel was applied vaginally once or twice daily for 14 days by low-risk abstinent and monogamous women. RESULTS: There was no change in frequency of Lactobacillus species after BufferGel use. However, there was a decrease in H2O2-producing lactobacilli (from 4.9 x 107 to 1.1 x 107 cfu; P = 0.001). The proportion of facultative gram-negative rods present increased from 27% to 65% after BufferGel use, whereas obligately anaerobic microbes decreased from 62% to 38%. CONCLUSION: Use of BufferGel once or twice daily for 14 days resulted in no clinically significant change in Lactobacillus colonization.
Authors: Andrei N Vzorov; Dabney W Dixon; Jenna S Trommel; Luigi G Marzilli; Richard W Compans Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Todd J Johnson; Priya Srinivasan; Theodore H Albright; Karen Watson-Buckheit; Lorna Rabe; Amy Martin; Chou-Pong Pau; R Michael Hendry; Ron Otten; Janet McNicholl; Robert Buckheit; James Smith; Patrick F Kiser Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Michele N Austin; Leslie A Meyn; Hilary A Avolia; Melinda A Petrina; Lisa A Cosentino; Calins Alphonse; Beatrice A Chen; Katherine Bunge; Lisa Noguchi; Richard Beigi; Kathleen Squires; Sharon L Hillier Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 7.759
Authors: Peter A Anton; Terry Saunders; Julie Elliott; Elena Khanukhova; Robert Dennis; Amy Adler; Galen Cortina; Karen Tanner; John Boscardin; William G Cumberland; Ying Zhou; Ana Ventuneac; Alex Carballo-Diéguez; Lorna Rabe; Timothy McCormick; Henry Gabelnick; Christine Mauck; Ian McGowan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Inês Bártolo; Ana Rita Diniz; Pedro Borrego; João Pedro Ferreira; Maria Rosário Bronze; Helena Barroso; Rui Pinto; Carlos Cardoso; João F Pinto; Rafael Ceña Diaz; Pilar Garcia Broncano; Maria Angel Muñoz-Fernández; Nuno Taveira Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-04-18 Impact factor: 3.240