Literature DB >> 11983541

Cardiac transplant patients response to the (31)P MRS stress test.

William T Evanochko1, Steven D Buchthal, Jan A den Hollander, Charles R Katholi, Robert C Bourge, Raymond L Benza, James K Kirklin, Gerald M Pohost.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies showed low resting phosphocreatine/adenosine triphosphate (PCr/ATP) ratios within this patient population compared with controls; however, these low PCr/ATP did not correlate with endomyocardial biopsy rejection. One possible explanation is the presence of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), which might be manifested as a transient ischemic event in the mildly stressed transplanted heart. If transient ischemia is invoked through the (31)P magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) stress test, monitoring of such an event should be achievable and thus implicating possible ischemic involvement.
METHODS: Heart transplant patients (n = 25) and normal controls (n = 11) were studied using the (31)P MRS stress test; 10 patients tested positive (> 2 standard deviations [SDs] from control values). Patients also were monitored for heart rate and blood pressure with the handgrip exercise generating a small increase in the rate-pressure product.
RESULTS: The percent change (%Delta) in the PCr/ATP ratio in the control group was 1.50% +/- 10.6; the transplant population showed an overall change of -6.7% +/- 18.5. The responders, those that were at or below the 2 SD line from control, had a -25.6 +/- 3.6% Delta PCr/ATP; whereas the non-responders reflect a 5.1 +/- 13.4%. The responders' response is quite striking when considering the threshold for an abnormal PCr/ATP %Delta in response to stress testing was -19.7%, which was the 2 SD mark below the mean value for the reference population. DISCUSSION: The (31)P MRS stress test showed that a possible transient ischemic event occurred in a subset of patients, thus implicating possible CAV in the cardiac transplant patient. Such an approach may provide an early diagnosis of this disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11983541     DOI: 10.1016/s1053-2498(01)00412-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  6 in total

1.  (31)P cardiac magnetic resonance spectroscopy during leg exercise at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Lucy E Hudsmith; Damian J Tyler; Yaso Emmanuel; Steffen E Petersen; Jane M Francis; Hugh Watkins; Kieran Clarke; Matthew D Robson; Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance: development, current utility and future applications.

Authors:  Thomas P Craven; Connie W Tsao; Andre La Gerche; Orlando P Simonetti; John P Greenwood
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 3.  Cardiac magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

Authors:  Stefan Neubauer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  The Value of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Heart Transplant Patients.

Authors:  Anna B Reid; Nick Waldron; Matthias Schmitt; Christopher A Miller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Gene Expression Signatures of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells during the Early Post-Transplant Period in Patients Developing Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

Authors:  Khurram Shahzad; Martin Cadeiras; Sarfaraz Memon; Barry Zeeberg; Tod Klingler; Anshu Sinha; Esteban G Tabak; Sreevalsa Unniachan; Mario C Deng
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-12-28

Review 6.  Low Tissue Creatine: A Therapeutic Target in Clinical Nutrition.

Authors:  Sergej M Ostojic
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 5.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.