Literature DB >> 11982610

Influence of dialysis on post-transplant events.

J T Joseph1, R M Jindal.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effect of haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) on acute rejection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival after cadaveric renal transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 325 patients (cyclosporin [CyA]-based therapy) who had their first cadaver renal transplant between January 1991 and December 1996 and followed up for a mean of 61 +/- 26 months. They were divided into three groups: HD, PD and CD (where both PD and HD was used for at least 3 months). Delayed graft function was diagnosed if the patient needed dialysis in the first week post-transplant while primary non-function (PNF) was diagnosed if the kidney never achieved function. Graft rejection was confirmed by biopsy; early acute rejection (EAR) was defined as acute rejection occurring before 90 days and late acute rejection (LAR) as one after 90 d.
RESULTS: A total of 183 patients had PD, 117 HD and 25 CD. The mean time period in which the patients were on dialysis for PD was 24 months, HD 34.5 months and CD 50.6 months (p < 0.01). The recipients were matched for age and gender. The donor variables (age, gender and cold ischaemia time) did not differ between the groups. The mean time for the development of first acute rejection following renal transplant in each group was as follows: PD group: 68.8 d, HD group: 81.3 d and CD group: 105 d (p = 0.08). The number of patients who developed EAR was 90 (49.2%) in PD group, 51 (43.6%) in HD group and 11 (56%) in CD group (p = 0.6); the number who developed LAR was nine in PD group (4.9%), six in HD group (5.1%) and one in CD group (4%) (p = 0.9). Fifty-six patients with PD had DGF compared with 58 with HD (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the number and severity of rejection episodes or DGF based on the duration of dialysis. The 5-yr survival of patients was 79% for PD, 81% HD and 78% CD groups (p = n.s), while the graft survival for PD group was 61%, HD group 63% and CD group 74% (p = n.s).
SUMMARY: We could find no difference in the patient or graft survival between patients who had pre-transplant HD, PD or CD. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes between the three groups of patients as well. However, we found a significantly higher rate of DGF in the HD versus PD patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11982610     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2002.00069.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transplant        ISSN: 0902-0063            Impact factor:   2.863


  5 in total

Review 1.  Marked variation in the definition and diagnosis of delayed graft function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sri G Yarlagadda; Steven G Coca; Amit X Garg; Mona Doshi; Emilio Poggio; Richard J Marcus; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Long-term effects of peritonitis on peritoneal dialysis outcomes.

Authors:  Dragan Klarić; Mladen Knotek
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Factors Influencing Long-Term Patient and Allograft Outcomes in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Sarah So; Eric H K Au; Wai H Lim; Vincent W S Lee; Germaine Wong
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 4.  Peritoneal Dialysis for Potential Kidney Transplant Recipients: Pride or Prejudice?

Authors:  Luca Nardelli; Antonio Scalamogna; Piergiorgio Messa; Maurizio Gallieni; Roberto Cacciola; Federica Tripodi; Giuseppe Castellano; Evaldo Favi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  The mode of pretransplant dialysis does not affect postrenal transplant outcomes in african americans.

Authors:  Amit Sharma; Todd L Teigeler; Martha Behnke; Adrian Cotterell; Robert Fisher; Anne King; Todd Gehr; Marc Posner
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.