Literature DB >> 11982469

Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy for duodenal polyposis.

Juan M Sarmiento1, Geoffrey B Thompson, David M Nagorney, John H Donohue, Michael B Farnell.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) is a safe and effective operative procedure for patients with nonmalignant duodenal polyps.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of outcomes in patients undergoing PSD.
SETTING: A tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing PSD at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn. Indications were the presence of numerous duodenal polyps or large, solitary, adenomatous polyps not amenable to endoscopic resection. Dysplasia without frank malignancy was demonstrated in all patients by endoscopic biopsy specimens. Follow-up was complete in all patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative feasibility, short- and long-term complications, quality of life, and survival.
RESULTS: Five patients had diffuse polyposis (familial adenomatous polyposis) and 3 had very large periampullary villous adenomas. The mean age of the patients was 54 years (female-male ratio, 3:1). Colectomy preceded PSD in 5 patients (familial adenomatous polyposis); 3 had previous transduodenal excision of adenomas, and 2 had previous resections of desmoid tumors. The mean operating room time was 370 minutes; blood loss, 340 mL; and the length of the hospital stay, 18 days. All specimens showed dysplasia (5 low grade, 3 high grade). There were 5 major complications--3 ampullary leaks that closed spontaneously with drainage, 1 intra-abdominal hemorrhage requiring a second exploratory surgical procedure, and 1 deep wound infection. The mean follow-up was 23 months. All patients experienced weight gain and good performance status. A second endoscopy (performed in 5 patients) demonstrated small polyps in the neoduodenum in 2 patients and tiny anastomotic ulcers in 2 patients. For 1 patient, there were no abnormalities seen on the endoscopy. Two patients have since developed transient bouts of pancreatitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy, although technically demanding, eliminates the need for pancreatic resection. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is associated with good absorptive capacity, weight gain, and quality of life. Furthermore, it may reduce the risk of subsequent malignancy. Long-term surveillance, however, is still required. Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy is contraindicated in the setting of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11982469     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.5.557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  32 in total

1.  Segmental duodenectomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the duodenum.

Authors:  Nicolas Christian Buchs; Pascal Bucher; Pascal Gervaz; Sandrine Ostermann; François Pugin; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Pancreas-sparing total duodenectomy for ampullary duodenal neoplasms.

Authors:  John A Stauffer; Cameron D Adkisson; Douglas L Riegert-Johnson; Ross F Goldberg; Steven P Bowers; Horacio J Asbun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy in a patient with acute corrosive injury.

Authors:  Vishnu Prasad Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah; Rajesh Gangavatiker; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2012-05-24

Review 4.  Retroduodenal resection of ampullary carcinoid tumor in a patient with cavernous transformation of the portal vein.

Authors:  Shin Hwang; Ki-Myung Moon; Jeong-Ik Park; Myung-Hwan Kim; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for advanced duodenal and ampullary adenomatosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  James R A Skipworth; Clare Morkane; Dimitri Aristotle Raptis; Soumil Vyas; Steven W Olde Damink; Charles J Imber; Stephen P Pereira; Massimo Malago; Nicholas West; Robin K S Phillips; Sue K Clark; Arjun Shankar
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Ability of FDG-PET to detect all cancers in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis, and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Mariëtte C A van Kouwen; Joost P H Drenth; J Han J M van Krieken; Harry van Goor; Pieter Friederich; Wim J G Oyen; Fokko M Nagengast
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Recurrences are common after endoscopic ampullectomy for adenoma in the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome.

Authors:  Tianle Ma; Eun Jeong Jang; Lawrence R Zukerberg; Robert Odze; Manish K Gala; Peter B Kelsey; David G Forcione; William R Brugge; Brenna W Casey; Sapna Syngal; Daniel C Chung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  David W Larson; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  In the beginning there was colectomy: current surgical options in familial adenomatous polyposis.

Authors:  Daniel R McGrath; Allan D Spigelman
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 2.857

10.  Pancreas sparing duodenectomy as an emergency procedure.

Authors:  Piotr Paluszkiewicz; Wojciech Dudek; Kathryn Lowery; Colin A Hart
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 5.469

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.