Literature DB >> 11981349

Escitalopram 10 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in a placebo-controlled study in depression in primary care.

A Wade1, O Michael Lemming, K Bang Hedegaard.   

Abstract

Escitalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), was compared to placebo in a study of patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) who had baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total scores >or=22 and <or=40. After a 1-week, single-blind placebo period, patients were randomized to receive escitalopram 10 mg/day (n=191) or placebo (n=189) in an 8-week, double-blind period. The primary efficacy analysis of adjusted mean change in MADRS total score from baseline showed a statistically significantly larger effect for escitalopram than for placebo with a treatment difference at week 8 (last observation carried forward, LOCF) of 2.7 points (SE 0.85; P=0.002). In further by-week efficacy analyses, the effect of escitalopram was consistently larger than that of placebo (P<0.05) beginning at week 1 (Clinical Global Impression-Improvement score), week 2 (MADRS score) or week 3 (Clinical Global Impression-Severity score). Escitalopram was very well tolerated with a low overall withdrawal rate similar to that for placebo. Nausea was the only adverse event reported significantly more in escitalopram-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients, although it was infrequent and transient. Escitalopram 10 mg/day had a statistically significantly better antidepressant effect than placebo as early as week 1, and was safe and very well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11981349     DOI: 10.1097/00004850-200205000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0268-1315            Impact factor:   1.659


  54 in total

Review 1.  Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Juan Undurraga; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Treatment of depression associated with age-related macular degeneration: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Barbara L Brody; Linda C Field; Anne-Catherine Roch-Levecq; Christine Y Moutier; Steven D Edland; Stuart I Brown
Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.567

3.  Chirality and drugs used to treat psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Glen B Baker; Trevor I Prior; Ronald T Coutts
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.186

4.  Stereochemistry in Drug Action.

Authors:  Jonathan McConathy; Michael J. Owens
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04

Review 5.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ewgeni Jakubovski; Anjali L Varigonda; Nicholas Freemantle; Matthew J Taylor; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 18.112

6.  Newer antidepressants in the primary care setting.

Authors:  J Sloan Manning
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

7.  Effects of venlafaxine and escitalopram treatments on NMDA receptors in the rat depression model.

Authors:  Nigar Yilmaz; Arif Demirdas; Mustafa Yilmaz; Recep Sutcu; Aynur Kirbas; Medine Cumhur Cure; Ibrahim Eren
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 1.843

8.  The effect of reporting methods for dosing times on the estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters of escitalopram.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Bruce G Pollock; Ellen Frank; Jeff Florian; Margaret Kirshner; Andrea Fagiolini; David J Kupfer; Marc R Gastonguay; Gail Kepple; Yan Feng; Robert R Bies
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 9.  Escitalopram: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in depression.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Treatment of anxiety and depression in transplant patients: pharmacokinetic considerations.

Authors:  Catherine C Crone; Geoffrey M Gabriel
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.