OBJECTIVE: To determine preoperative predictors of survival that can guide the choice of treatment for patients with small hepatocellular cancers (HCCs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of patients with small (</=5 cm in diameter) HCCs is controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 249 patients (69 women, 180 men; median age 62 years) who underwent resection with curative intent for small HCC was identified from a multiinstitutional database. For each patient, the clinical data and pathology slides were reviewed. Six clinical factors (age, gender, preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level, hepatitis serology, number of tumors [single vs. multiple], and Child-Pugh score) and three pathologic factors (hepatitis activity score, fibrosis score, and Edmondson-Steiner tumor grade) that can be determined before surgery were correlated with survival. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to determine factors influencing survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 4.2 years. The estimated overall 5- and 8-year survival rates were 41.1% and 19.8%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that fibrosis score, Edmondson-Steiner grade, and Child-Pugh score were simultaneously significant predictors of survival after resection. A prognostic scoring system based on these covariates was derived and applied to the entire cohort. Patients lacking all three risk factors were assigned a score of 1, patients with one risk factor were assigned a score of 2, and patients with two or three risk factors were assigned a score of 3. Pairwise log-rank tests indicated significant differences in survival between scores 1 and 2, scores 2 and 3, and scores 1 and 3. This scoring system retained its prognostic significance when a subset of 98 patients with positive hepatitis C serology was analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with small HCCs who will derive the least benefit from resection can be identified before surgery using a score based on tumor grade and the severity of underlying liver disease. In these patients, transplantation and/or ablation should be considered as possible alternative therapies.
OBJECTIVE: To determine preoperative predictors of survival that can guide the choice of treatment for patients with small hepatocellular cancers (HCCs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of patients with small (</=5 cm in diameter) HCCs is controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 249 patients (69 women, 180 men; median age 62 years) who underwent resection with curative intent for small HCC was identified from a multiinstitutional database. For each patient, the clinical data and pathology slides were reviewed. Six clinical factors (age, gender, preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level, hepatitis serology, number of tumors [single vs. multiple], and Child-Pugh score) and three pathologic factors (hepatitis activity score, fibrosis score, and Edmondson-Steiner tumor grade) that can be determined before surgery were correlated with survival. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to determine factors influencing survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 4.2 years. The estimated overall 5- and 8-year survival rates were 41.1% and 19.8%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that fibrosis score, Edmondson-Steiner grade, and Child-Pugh score were simultaneously significant predictors of survival after resection. A prognostic scoring system based on these covariates was derived and applied to the entire cohort. Patients lacking all three risk factors were assigned a score of 1, patients with one risk factor were assigned a score of 2, and patients with two or three risk factors were assigned a score of 3. Pairwise log-rank tests indicated significant differences in survival between scores 1 and 2, scores 2 and 3, and scores 1 and 3. This scoring system retained its prognostic significance when a subset of 98 patients with positive hepatitis C serology was analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with small HCCs who will derive the least benefit from resection can be identified before surgery using a score based on tumor grade and the severity of underlying liver disease. In these patients, transplantation and/or ablation should be considered as possible alternative therapies.
Authors: R Lencioni; F Pinto; N Armillotta; A M Bassi; M Moretti; M Di Giulio; S Marchi; M Uliana; S Della Capanna; M Lencioni; C Bartolozzi Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 1997 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: K Ishak; A Baptista; L Bianchi; F Callea; J De Groote; F Gudat; H Denk; V Desmet; G Korb; R N MacSween Journal: J Hepatol Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: G Colella; G F Rondinara; L De Carlis; C V Sansalone; A O Slim; P Aseni; O Rossetti; A De Gasperi; E Minola; R Bottelli; L S Belli; G Ideo; D Forti Journal: Transpl Int Date: 1996 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: F Chapel; C Guettier; C Chastang; A A Rached; D Mathieu; M Tepper; M Beaugrand; J C Trinchet Journal: Cancer Date: 1996-03-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: V Mazzaferro; E Regalia; R Doci; S Andreola; A Pulvirenti; F Bozzetti; F Montalto; M Ammatuna; A Morabito; L Gennari Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-03-14 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: G Ercolani; Alessandro Cucchetti; Matteo Cescon; Matteo Ravaioli; Gian Luca Grazi; Antonio D Pinna Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jae Hyun Han; Dong Goo Kim; Gun Hyung Na; Eun Young Kim; Soo Ho Lee; Tae Ho Hong; Young Kyoung You Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-12-07 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Ke Hao; John M Luk; Nikki P Y Lee; Mao Mao; Chunsheng Zhang; Mark D Ferguson; John Lamb; Hongyue Dai; Irene O Ng; Pak C Sham; Ronnie T P Poon Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 4.430