BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to investigate the reproducibility of information on sun exposure, skin characteristics and sunburn collected through a standardized questionnaire used in the multi-centre South European case-control study on skin cancer, 'Helios'. We also intended to use results from reproducibility analysis for correcting odds ratio (OR) estimates from the original study. METHODS: We re-interviewed, with the same questionnaire, a sample of 115 cases of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and 119 population controls, 18-26 months apart, in four centres of Italy, Spain and France. The questionnaire included questions on skin characteristics, sunburns and sun exposure histories. We investigated agreement, studying the association between the difference of the two measures and a set of explanatory variables. According to the results of the reproducibility analysis we corrected OR estimates from the original study simultaneously adjusting for random measurement error. RESULTS: Hair and eye colour showed high agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. Lifetime sun exposure showed substantial agreement with ICC ranging from 0.68 for time spent doing outdoor work to 0.79 for time spent outdoors during holidays and holidays at the beach. The poorest agreement was found for number of lifetime sunburns (ICC = 0.25), while sunburns during childhood showed a substantial agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.67). Lack of reproducibility was mainly associated with subjects' education, while no significant differences were observed between cases and controls. The corrected OR showed a moderate increase with a reinforcement of the effect of sun exposure and skin reaction to sun exposure. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was good reproducibility, particularly in the case of sun exposure histories, between answers given on two different occasions to a questionnaire administered by trained interviewers. However, since measurement error can substantially bias OR toward the null value, it should be taken into account in estimates of the effect of sun exposure on risk of skin cancer.
BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study is to investigate the reproducibility of information on sun exposure, skin characteristics and sunburn collected through a standardized questionnaire used in the multi-centre South European case-control study on skin cancer, 'Helios'. We also intended to use results from reproducibility analysis for correcting odds ratio (OR) estimates from the original study. METHODS: We re-interviewed, with the same questionnaire, a sample of 115 cases of basal cell and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin and 119 population controls, 18-26 months apart, in four centres of Italy, Spain and France. The questionnaire included questions on skin characteristics, sunburns and sun exposure histories. We investigated agreement, studying the association between the difference of the two measures and a set of explanatory variables. According to the results of the reproducibility analysis we corrected OR estimates from the original study simultaneously adjusting for random measurement error. RESULTS: Hair and eye colour showed high agreement with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.81 and 0.74, respectively. Lifetime sun exposure showed substantial agreement with ICC ranging from 0.68 for time spent doing outdoor work to 0.79 for time spent outdoors during holidays and holidays at the beach. The poorest agreement was found for number of lifetime sunburns (ICC = 0.25), while sunburns during childhood showed a substantial agreement (Cohen's Kappa = 0.67). Lack of reproducibility was mainly associated with subjects' education, while no significant differences were observed between cases and controls. The corrected OR showed a moderate increase with a reinforcement of the effect of sun exposure and skin reaction to sun exposure. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was good reproducibility, particularly in the case of sun exposure histories, between answers given on two different occasions to a questionnaire administered by trained interviewers. However, since measurement error can substantially bias OR toward the null value, it should be taken into account in estimates of the effect of sun exposure on risk of skin cancer.
Authors: Mingfeng Zhang; Abrar A Qureshi; Alan C Geller; Lindsay Frazier; David J Hunter; Jiali Han Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-02-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lawrence Fitzgerald Kuklinski; Michael Scot Zens; Ann E Perry; Adele C Green; Margaret R Karagas Journal: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 3.135
Authors: Catherine M Olsen; Michael S Zens; Adele C Green; Therese A Stukel; C D'Arcy J Holman; Thomas Mack; J Mark Elwood; Elizabeth A Holly; Carlotta Sacerdote; Richard Gallagher; Anthony J Swerdlow; Bruce K Armstrong; Stefano Rosso; Connie Kirkpatrick; Roberto Zanetti; Julia Newton Bishop; Veronique Bataille; Yu-Mei Chang; Rona Mackie; Anne Østerlind; Marianne Berwick; Margaret R Karagas; David C Whiteman Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Anne E Cust; Helen Schmid; Judith A Maskiell; Jodie Jetann; Megan Ferguson; Elizabeth A Holland; Chantelle Agha-Hamilton; Mark A Jenkins; John Kelly; Richard F Kefford; Graham G Giles; Bruce K Armstrong; Joanne F Aitken; John L Hopper; Graham J Mann Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amanda J Baxter; Maria Celia Hughes; Marina Kvaskoff; Victor Siskind; Sri Shekar; Joanne F Aitken; Adele C Green; David L Duffy; Nicholas K Hayward; Nicholas G Martin; David C Whiteman Journal: Twin Res Hum Genet Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 1.587
Authors: Natasha Buchanan; Wendy Leisenring; Pauline A Mitby; Anna T Meadows; Leslie L Robison; Melissa M Hudson; Ann C Mertens Journal: Cancer Date: 2009-09-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Chu-Ling Yu; Yan Li; D Michal Freedman; Thomas R Fears; Richard Kwok; Gabriel Chodick; Bruce Alexander; Michael G Kimlin; Anne Kricker; Bruce K Armstrong; Martha S Linet Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.254