Literature DB >> 11980734

Multiplex interphase FISH as a screen for common aneuploidies in spontaneous abortions.

Vaidehi Jobanputra1, Antonio Sobrino, Ann Kinney, Jennie Kline, Dorothy Warburton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A multiplex fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) strategy using chromosome-specific probes for eight chromosomes as an initial screen for chromosome abnormalities in uncultured tissues from spontaneous abortions was evaluated.
METHODS: Fifty-seven prefetal spontaneous abortions were studied by karyotyping cultured cells and using FISH on uncultured cells. Two probe sets were used, identifying chromosomes 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y.
RESULTS: Abnormalities were detected in 53% of cases by karyotyping, and 54% of cases by FISH. FISH detected an abnormality in four of five cases where cultures failed, and in two cases where maternal cells apparently overgrew the culture. FISH missed four trisomies not identifiable with the probe sets, and one trisomy because one probe set was unscorable. FISH using these probes identified 83% of all abnormalities detected by karyotyping.
CONCLUSIONS: FISH can detect abnormalities in a significant proportion of cases where the culture fails to grow or is contaminated by maternal cell growth. Multiplex FISH as an initial screen, followed by culture and karyotyping in cases where no abnormality is detected, would identify a higher proportion of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortion specimens than karyotype analysis alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11980734     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.5.1166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Application of touch FISH in the study of mosaic tetraploidy and maternal cell contamination in pregnancy losses.

Authors:  Sofia Dória; Vera Lima; Berta Carvalho; Maria Lina Moreira; Mário Sousa; Alberto Barros; Filipa Carvalho
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Cytogenetic Analysis of the Products of Conception After Spontaneous Abortion in the First Trimester.

Authors:  Xueluo Zhang; Junmei Fan; Yanhua Chen; Jun Wang; Zhijiao Song; Jinghui Zhao; Zhongyun Li; Xueqing Wu; Yuanjing Hu
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Skewed X chromosome inactivation and trisomic spontaneous abortion: no association.

Authors:  Dorothy Warburton; Jennie Kline; Ann Kinney; Chih-Yu Yu; Bruce Levin; Stephen Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-07-30       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Using FISH to increase the yield and accuracy of karyotypes from spontaneous abortion specimens.

Authors:  Vaidehi Jobanputra; Cecilia Esteves; Antonio Sobrino; Stephen Brown; Jennie Kline; Dorothy Warburton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 5.  1(st) trimester miscarriage: four decades of study.

Authors:  Kathy Hardy; Philip John Hardy
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04

6.  Single nucleotide polymorphism-based microarray analysis for the diagnosis of hydatidiform moles.

Authors:  Yingjun Xie; Xiaojuan Pei; Yu Dong; Huiqun Wu; Jianzhu Wu; Huijuan Shi; Xuying Zhuang; Xiaofang Sun; Jialing He
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.952

7.  Array comparative genomic hybridization and flow cytometry analysis of spontaneous abortions and mors in utero samples.

Authors:  Björn Menten; Katrien Swerts; Barbara Delle Chiaie; Sandra Janssens; Karen Buysse; Jan Philippé; Frank Speleman
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Array-based comparative genomic hybridization is more informative than conventional karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization in the analysis of first-trimester spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  Jinsong Gao; Congcong Liu; Fengxia Yao; Na Hao; Jing Zhou; Qian Zhou; Liang Zhang; Xinyan Liu; Xuming Bian; Juntao Liu
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: what technology should you use and what are the differences?

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Raymond Anchan; William G Kearns
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.357

10.  Chromosome aberrations in a large series of spontaneous miscarriages in the German population and review of the literature.

Authors:  Jutta Jenderny
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.