Literature DB >> 11979310

Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison of an antigenemia assay and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.

K Yakushiji1, H Gondo, K Kamezaki, K Shigematsu, S Hayashi, M Kuroiwa, S Taniguchi, Y Ohno, K Takase, A Numata, K Aoki, K Kato, K Nagafuji, K Shimoda, T Okamura, N Kinukawa, N Kasuga, M Sata, M Harada.   

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemia and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were compared for monitoring of CMV reactivation after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The number of CMV antigen-positive cells by the antigenemia assay and the level of CMV DNA by real-time PCR correlated well. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigenemia assay was 55.4% and 95.5%, respectively, using real-time PCR as the reference standard. The probability of positive antigenemia at day 100 was 76.5%, with a median of first detection at day 37 in 51 patients, compared with a positive PCR of 84.3% and day 33, respectively. When HLA-identical sibling donor transplant recipients and other donor transplant recipients were analyzed separately, there was no difference between the two tests. However, temporal patterns of first detection of CMV antigen-positive cells and CMV DNA differed between HLA-identical and alternative recipients; patients without CMV (29%) or with sporadic positive PCR results (14%) were more common in HLA-identical sibling transplants, whereas patients with simultaneous antigenemia and positive PCR occurred more in alternative transplants (48%). Two of 51 patients (4%) developed CMV colitis despite antigenemia-guided prophylaxis, but both were successfully treated with ganciclovir. Although PCR is more sensitive than antigenemia, both tests are useful in the early detection of CMV after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11979310     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 0268-3369            Impact factor:   5.483


  14 in total

1.  Real-time PCR assay compared to nested PCR and antigenemia assays for detecting cytomegalovirus reactivation in adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Junji Ikewaki; Eiichi Ohtsuka; Rie Kawano; Masao Ogata; Hiroshi Kikuchi; Masaru Nasu
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Real-time PCR in clinical microbiology: applications for routine laboratory testing.

Authors:  M J Espy; J R Uhl; L M Sloan; S P Buckwalter; M F Jones; E A Vetter; J D C Yao; N L Wengenack; J E Rosenblatt; F R Cockerill; T F Smith
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Quantification of DNA in plasma by an automated real-time PCR assay (cytomegalovirus PCR kit) for surveillance of active cytomegalovirus infection and guidance of preemptive therapy for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Concepción Gimeno; Carlos Solano; José C Latorre; Juan C Hernández-Boluda; María A Clari; María J Remigia; Santiago Furió; Marisa Calabuig; Nuria Tormo; David Navarro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Construction and Evaluation of Cytomegalovirus DNA Quantification System with Real-Time Detection Polymerase Chain Reaction.

Authors:  Yuki Hatayama; Yuki Hashimoto; Ayako Hara; Toru Motokura
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 1.641

5.  Fungal and viral infections after allogeneic hematopoietic transplantation from unrelated donors in adults: improving outcomes over time.

Authors:  R Parody; R Martino; R de la Cámara; A García-Noblejas; A Esquirol; I Garcia-Cadenas; T Villaescusa; D Caballero; M Rovira; F Fernandez-Avilés; F J Marquez-Malaver; I Espigado; C Castilla-Llorente; I Heras; M A Cabero; J R Cabrera; P Barba; D Valcarcel; I Sánchez-Ortega; R F Duarte; D Serrano; F Carretero; L Vazquez
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Efficacy of prophylactic letermovir for cytomegalovirus reactivation in hematopoietic cell transplantation: a multicenter real-world data.

Authors:  Yasuo Mori; Fumiaki Jinnouchi; Katsuto Takenaka; Takatoshi Aoki; Takuro Kuriyama; Masanori Kadowaki; Jun Odawara; Toshiyuki Ueno; Kentaro Kohno; Takuya Harada; Goichi Yoshimoto; Ken Takase; Hideho Henzan; Koji Kato; Yoshikiyo Ito; Tomohiko Kamimura; Yuju Ohno; Ryosuke Ogawa; Tetsuya Eto; Koji Nagafuji; Koichi Akashi; Toshihiro Miyamoto
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 5.483

7.  Monitoring cytomegalovirus infection in adult and pediatric bone marrow transplant recipients by a real-time PCR assay performed with blood plasma.

Authors:  Marianne Leruez-Ville; Marie Ouachée; Richard Delarue; Anne-Sophie Sauget; Stéphane Blanche; Agnès Buzyn; Christine Rouzioux
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Greet J Boland; Leo F Verdonck
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Validation of clinical application of cytomegalovirus plasma DNA load measurement and definition of treatment criteria by analysis of correlation to antigen detection.

Authors:  Jayant S Kalpoe; Aloys C M Kroes; Menno D de Jong; Janke Schinkel; Caroline S de Brouwer; Matthias F C Beersma; Eric C J Claas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Monitoring of cytomegalovirus reactivation in bone marrow transplant recipients by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Seyed H Ghaffari; Narghes Obeidi; Mehdi Dehghan; Kamran Alimoghaddam; Ahmad Gharehbaghian; Ardashir Ghavamzadeh
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.